BOOKS

Reasoning with Previous Judgments in European Court of Human Rights

In this paper reasoning with judicial precedents is considered as a superior alternative to speculative reasoning which is not directly based on any source of law. Judicial precedents offer the advantage of law being publicly announced in advance. Meanwhile this is not a common attribute of the logically based search of implicit meaning between the lines of statutory rules.

All text >

Authors: Johanas Baltrimas
Reviewers:
prof. dr. (HP) Egidijus Kūris ir doc. dr. Ernestas Spruogis