{"id":1518,"date":"2016-10-17T10:00:53","date_gmt":"2016-10-17T07:00:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/teise.org\/?p=1518"},"modified":"2023-02-10T17:29:04","modified_gmt":"2023-02-10T17:29:04","slug":"vienas-prestiziskiausiu-europos-teises-zurnalu-paskelbe-lti-mokslininkes-agnes-limantes-publikacija","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/vienas-prestiziskiausiu-europos-teises-zurnalu-paskelbe-lti-mokslininkes-agnes-limantes-publikacija\/","title":{"rendered":"Vienas prestizi\u0161kiausi\u0173 Europos teis\u0117s \u017eurnal\u0173 paskelb\u0117 LTI mokslinink\u0117s Agn\u0117s Limant\u0117s publikacij\u0105"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>[:lt]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Naujausiame Jungtin\u0117je Karalyst\u0117je leid\u017eiamo \u017eurnalo <em>JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies<\/em> numeryje paskelbtas LTI mokslinin\u0117s Agn\u0117s Limant\u0117s straipsnis \u201cRecent Developments in the <em>Acte Clair<\/em> Case Law of the EU Court of Justice: Towards a more Flexible Approach\u201d (liet. Naujausios tendencijos Europos S\u0105jungos Teisingumo Teismo bylose ai\u0161kinant acte clair: lankstesnio po\u017ei\u016brio kryptimi). \u0160is \u017eurnalas \u2013 vienas geriausiai vertinam\u0173 teis\u0117s \u017eurnal\u0173 Europoje, kurio citavimo indeksas (<em>impact factor<\/em>) 1.83, o pats \u017eurnalas skelbiamas ne vienoje svarbioje baz\u0117je.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Straipsnyje analizuojama prejudicini\u0173 kreipim\u0173si kontekste itin aktuali <em>acte clair<\/em> doktrina, j\u0105 tiriant neseniai Europos S\u0105jungos Teisingumo Teismo priimt\u0173 sprendim\u0173 <em>Ferreira da Silva<\/em> and <em>X <\/em>ir<em> van Dijk<\/em> bylose kontekste. Autor\u0117 ap\u017evelgia ankstesn\u0119 Teismo praktik\u0105 ai\u0161kinant <em>acte clair<\/em>, tuomet kriti\u0161kai vertina <em>Ferreira da Silva<\/em> and <em>X <\/em>ir<em> van Dijk <\/em>sprendimus. Mokslinink\u0117 teigia, kad garsiojoje <em>Cilfit <\/em>byloje pateikti kriterijai, nors da\u017enai cituojami doktrinoje ir teism\u0173 sprendimuose, niekuomet nebuvo nuosekliai ir grie\u017etai naudojami Teisingumo Teismo praktikoje ir vis labiau linkstama prie lankstesnio po\u017ei\u016brio.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/jcms.12434\/full\">http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/jcms.12434\/full<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[:]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[:lt] Naujausiame Jungtin\u0117je Karalyst\u0117je leid\u017eiamo \u017eurnalo JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies numeryje paskelbtas LTI mokslinin\u0117s Agn\u0117s Limant\u0117s straipsnis \u201cRecent Developments in the Acte Clair Case Law of the EU Court of Justice: Towards a more Flexible Approach\u201d (liet. Naujausios tendencijos Europos S\u0105jungos Teisingumo Teismo bylose ai\u0161kinant acte clair: lankstesnio po\u017ei\u016brio kryptimi). \u0160is \u017eurnalas \u2013 vienas geriausiai vertinam\u0173 teis\u0117s \u017eurnal\u0173 Europoje, kurio citavimo indeksas (impact factor) 1.83, o pats \u017eurnalas skelbiamas ne vienoje svarbioje baz\u0117je. Straipsnyje analizuojama prejudicini\u0173 kreipim\u0173si kontekste itin aktuali acte clair doktrina, j\u0105 tiriant neseniai Europos S\u0105jungos Teisingumo Teismo priimt\u0173 sprendim\u0173 Ferreira da Silva and X ir van Dijk bylose kontekste. Autor\u0117 ap\u017evelgia ankstesn\u0119 Teismo praktik\u0105 ai\u0161kinant acte clair, tuomet kriti\u0161kai vertina Ferreira da Silva and X ir van Dijk sprendimus. Mokslinink\u0117 teigia, kad garsiojoje Cilfit byloje pateikti kriterijai, nors da\u017enai cituojami doktrinoje ir teism\u0173 sprendimuose, niekuomet nebuvo nuosekliai ir grie\u017etai naudojami Teisingumo Teismo praktikoje ir vis labiau linkstama prie lankstesnio po\u017ei\u016brio. http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/jcms.12434\/full [:]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1519,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,259],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1518","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-naujienos","category-2016-naujienu-irasu-metai"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1518","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1518"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1518\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6911,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1518\/revisions\/6911"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1519"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1518"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1518"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1518"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}