{"id":19894,"date":"2025-01-02T14:54:02","date_gmt":"2025-01-02T14:54:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/teise.org\/?p=19894"},"modified":"2025-01-24T14:01:55","modified_gmt":"2025-01-24T14:01:55","slug":"20250102-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/20250102-2\/","title":{"rendered":"In a Prestigious European Academic Blog - Institute Representatives on Artificial Intelligence in Ukraine\u2019s Judiciary"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

One of Europe\u2019s most famous academic blogs, Verfassungsblog, has published an article titled \u201cAI in Ukraine\u2019s Judiciary\u201d, written by Dr Agn\u0117 Limant\u0117, a researcher at the Law Institute of the Lithuanian Centre for Social Sciences, and Yuliia Moskvytyn, an intern in Institute via the UPinLT programme, that funds internships for foreign students in Lithuania. The publication examines the steps taken by the Ukrainian state to introduce AI technologies in the Ukrainian judiciary, despite the challenges posed by the ongoing war waged by Russia.<\/p>

The article discusses the period from the 2014 initiative to reform the justice system to the 2018 phase of digitisation in the courts, the publication presents the technologies used and the initiatives proposed, and discusses policy and legal documents.<\/p>

The large-scale war in Ukraine since 2022 has created many challenges for the functioning of the state and temporarily slowed down the development of AI technologies, but at the same time, the difficult times have spurred modernisation, especially in the public sector. One example of this is the integration of modern technologies and AI tools into the judicial system.<\/p>

The authors note that in September 2024, the Code of Judicial Ethics in Ukraine was amended to allow judges to use artificial intelligence technologies in their professional activities \u201cprovided that it does not affect the judge\u2019s independence and impartiality, does not influence the evaluation of evidence and the decision-making process, and does not violate the requirements of the law\u201d. These amendments suggest that the use of artificial intelligence in Ukrainian courts is likely to increase.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

Read more about the integration of AI in the Ukrainian judiciary, the opportunities and challenges here: https:\/\/verfassungsblog.de\/ai-ukraine-judiciary\/<\/a><\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0<\/div>
\u00a0<\/div>
\u00a0<\/div>
\u00a0<\/div>
\u00a0<\/div>
\u00a0<\/div>
\u00a0<\/div>
\u00a0<\/div>
\u00a0<\/div>
\u00a0<\/div>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Viename garsiausi\u0173 Europos akademini\u0173 tinklara\u0161\u010di\u0173 Verfassungsblog paskelbtas Lietuvos socialini\u0173 moksl\u0173 centro Teis\u0117s instituto mokslinink\u0117s dr. Agn\u0117s Limant\u0117s ir praktikant\u0117s pagal u\u017esienio student\u0173 praktikas Lietuvoje finansuojan\u010di\u0105 \u201eUPinLT\u201c program\u0105 Yuliios Moskvytyn parengtas straipsnis \u201eAI in Ukraines Judiciary\u201c (liet. Dirbtinis intelektas Ukrainos teism\u0173 sistemoje). Publikacijoje nagrin\u0117jami Ukrainos valstyb\u0117s \u017eingsniai \u012fdiegiant dirbtinio intelekto technologijas Ukrainos teismuose, nepaisant Rusijos vykdomo karo keliam\u0173 i\u0161\u0161\u016bki\u0173. Straipsnyje aptariamas laikotarpis nuo 2014\u00a0met\u0173 iniciatyvos reformuoti teism\u0173 sistem\u0105, 2018\u00a0metais prasid\u0117jusio skaitmenizacijos etapo teismuose, pristatomos naudojamos technologijos bei si\u016blomos iniciatyvos, aptariami politiniai ir teisiniai dokumentai. Nuo 2022\u00a0met\u0173 vykstantis plataus masto karas Ukrainoje suk\u0117l\u0117 daug i\u0161\u0161\u016bki\u0173 valstyb\u0117s veikime ir laikinai pristabd\u0117 dirbtinio intelekto technologij\u0173 pl\u0117tr\u0105, ta\u010diau kartu sunk\u016bs laikai paskatino modernizacij\u0105, ypa\u010d vie\u0161ajame sektoriuje. Vienas to pavyzd\u017ei\u0173\u00a0\u2013 moderni\u0173 technologij\u0173 ir dirbtinio intelekto \u012franki\u0173 integracija \u012f teism\u0173 sistem\u0105. Autor\u0117s pastebi, kad 2024\u00a0m. rugs\u0117j\u012f Ukrainoje buvo i\u0161 dalies pakeistas Teis\u0117j\u0173 etikos kodeksas, pagal kur\u012f dabar teis\u0117jams leid\u017eiama savo profesin\u0117je veikloje naudoti dirbtinio intelekto technologijas, \u201ejei tai neturi \u012ftakos teis\u0117jo nepriklausomumui ir ne\u0161ali\u0161kumui, nedaro \u012ftakos \u012frodym\u0173 vertinimui ir sprendim\u0173 pri\u0117mimo procesui ir nepa\u017eeid\u017eia \u012fstatym\u0173 reikalavim\u0173\u201c. \u0160ie pakeitimai rodo, kad tik\u0117tina, jog dirbtinio intelekto naudojimas Ukrainos teismuose aktyv\u0117s. \u00a0 Daugiau apie dirbtinio intelekto integracij\u0105 Ukrainos teism\u0173 sistemoje, galimybes ir kylan\u010dius i\u0161\u0161\u016bkius skaitykite \u010dia\u00a0\u2013 https:\/\/verfassungsblog.de\/ai-ukraine-judiciary\/ \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":19895,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,268],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19894","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-naujienos","category-268"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19894","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19894"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19894\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19902,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19894\/revisions\/19902"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/19895"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19894"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19894"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19894"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}