{"id":20418,"date":"2025-05-12T07:51:19","date_gmt":"2025-05-12T07:51:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/teise.org\/?p=20418"},"modified":"2025-05-12T07:57:39","modified_gmt":"2025-05-12T07:57:39","slug":"20250512-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/20250512-2\/","title":{"rendered":"The Issue of Parental Child Abduction in the Case Law of Lithuanian and Polish Courts \u2013 Trends, Differences, and Challenges"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

A publication by the Law Institute of the Lithuanian Centre for Social Sciences (LI LCSS) has appeared in the 2025 edition of the International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family<\/i>, published by Oxford University Press. Dr. Agn\u0117 Limant\u0117, a researcher at the LCSS Law Institute, together with Dr. Anna Wysocka-Bar from the Centre for Private International Law at the Faculty of Law of Jagiellonian University, co-authored the article titled \u201cCross-Border Child Abduction from the UK: Comparative Analysis of Polish and Lithuanian Court Cases\u201d<\/i>.<\/p>

In this publication, Dr. Limant\u0117 and Dr. Wysocka-Bar examine court cases from Lithuania and Poland that deal with instances of parental child abduction\u2014specifically, situations where one parent, a citizen of either Lithuania or Poland who had been residing in the United Kingdom, returns to their home country with the child(ren) without the other parent\u2019s consent, thereby potentially abducting the child(ren).<\/p>

The article presents a thorough comparative analysis of judicial practices over a five-year period (2019\u20132023), focusing on cases directly related to the application and interpretation of the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction.<\/p>

The study identifies the legal procedures courts must follow in determining whether a parental abduction has occurred and in deciding whether the child(ren) should be returned to the United Kingdom, in accordance with the 1980 Hague Convention, the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, and other relevant legal instruments. The authors also present statistical data on such legal violations and conclude with an analysis of key differences between Lithuanian and Polish judicial approaches to cases involving potential parental child abduction.<\/p>

Publication<\/a> by A. Limant\u0117 and A. Wysocka-Bar.<\/p>

\u00a0<\/div>
\u00a0<\/div>
\u00a0<\/div>
\u00a0<\/div>
\u00a0<\/div>
\u00a0<\/div>
\u00a0<\/div>
\u00a0<\/div>
\u00a0<\/div>
\u00a0<\/div>
\u00a0<\/div>
\u00a0<\/div>
\u00a0<\/div>
\u00a0<\/div>
\u00a0<\/div>
\u00a0<\/div>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Oksfordo universiteto leidyklos 2025 m. moksliniame \u017eurnale \u201eInternational Journal of Law, Policy and the Family\u201c pasirod\u0117 Lietuvos socialini\u0173 moksl\u0173 centro (toliau \u2013 LSMC) Teis\u0117s instituto publikacija. LSMC Teis\u0117s instituto mokslinink\u0117 dr. Agn\u0117 Limant\u0117 kartu su Jogailos universiteto Teis\u0117s fakulteto Tarptautin\u0117s privatin\u0117s teis\u0117s centro darbuotoja dr. Anna Wysocka-Bar publikavo straipsn\u012f \u201eCross-Border Child Abduction from the UK: Comparative Analysis of Polish and Lithuanian Court Cases\u201c (liet. \u201eTarptautinis vaik\u0173 grobimas i\u0161 Jungtin\u0117s Karalyst\u0117s: Lenkijos ir Lietuvos teismo byl\u0173 lyginamoji analiz\u0117\u201c). Dr. Agn\u0117 Limant\u0117 ir dr. Anna Wysocka-Bar analizavo Lietuvos ir Lenkijos teism\u0173 bylas, kuriose nagrin\u0117jami t\u0117v\u0173 vykdomi vaik\u0173 grobimai \u2013 atvejai, kai vienas i\u0161 vaik\u0173 t\u0117v\u0173 \u2013 Lietuvos arba Lenkijos pilietis, gyven\u0119s Jungtin\u0117je Karalyst\u0117je ir v\u0117liau gr\u012f\u017e\u0119s \u012f savo gimt\u0105j\u0105 \u0161al\u012f, be kito t\u0117vo sutikimo paima, t. y. galimai pagrobia, savo vaik\u0105\u00a0(-us). Publikacijoje pateikta i\u0161sami lyginamoji teism\u0173 praktikos analiz\u0117 ap\u0117m\u0117 penkeri\u0173 met\u0173 (nuo 2019 iki 2023 m.) Lietuvos ir Lenkijos teism\u0173 bylas, kurios yra glaud\u017eiai susijusios su 1980 met\u0173 Hagos konvencijos d\u0117l tarptautinio vaik\u0173 grobimo \u012fgyvendinimu bei interpretacija. Tyrimo rezultatai atskleid\u0117, kokius teisinius etapus turi \u012fveikti teismai, siekdami nustatyti galimus t\u0117v\u0173 vykdomus vaik\u0173 pagrobimus ir nuspr\u0119sti galim\u0105 vaiko (-\u0173) (ne)gr\u0105\u017einim\u0105 \u012f Jungtin\u0119 Karalyst\u0119, remiantis 1980\u00a0m. Hagos konvencija, Europos S\u0105jungos Teisingumo Teismo praktika ir kitais dokumentais. Be to, autor\u0117s ap\u017evelgia \u0161i\u0173 teis\u0117s pa\u017eeidim\u0173 statistinius duomenis, o galiausiai aptaria esminius skirtumus tarp Lietuvos ir Lenkijos teism\u0173 praktikos t\u0117v\u0173 vykdomo galimo vaik\u0173 grobimo bylose. A. Limant\u0117s ir A. Wysocka-Bar publikacija. \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":20424,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,268],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20418","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-naujienos","category-268"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20418","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20418"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20418\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20427,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20418\/revisions\/20427"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/20424"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20418"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20418"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20418"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}