{"id":21839,"date":"2026-05-12T07:53:00","date_gmt":"2026-05-12T07:53:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/teise.org\/?p=21839"},"modified":"2026-05-12T07:53:55","modified_gmt":"2026-05-12T07:53:55","slug":"20260512-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/20260512-2\/","title":{"rendered":"The Researchers of the Law Institute of the Lithuanian Centre for Social Sciences Publish a Global Comparative Handbook on AI in Courts"},"content":{"rendered":"<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-post\" data-elementor-id=\"21839\" class=\"elementor elementor-21839\" data-elementor-post-type=\"post\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-324a111d e-flex e-con-boxed jltma-glass-effect-no wpr-particle-no wpr-jarallax-no wpr-parallax-no wpr-sticky-section-no wpr-column-slider-no wpr-equal-height-no e-con e-parent\" data-id=\"324a111d\" data-element_type=\"container\" data-e-type=\"container\" data-settings=\"{&quot;_ob_use_container_extras&quot;:&quot;no&quot;,&quot;_ob_column_hoveranimator&quot;:&quot;no&quot;,&quot;_ob_glider_is_slider&quot;:&quot;no&quot;,&quot;_ob_column_has_pseudo&quot;:&quot;no&quot;}\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"e-con-inner\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-b11a60f ob-harakiri-inherit jltma-glass-effect-no ob-has-background-overlay elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"b11a60f\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-settings=\"{&quot;_ob_use_harakiri&quot;:&quot;yes&quot;,&quot;_ob_harakiri_writing_mode&quot;:&quot;inherit&quot;,&quot;_ob_postman_use&quot;:&quot;no&quot;,&quot;_ob_widget_stalker_use&quot;:&quot;no&quot;,&quot;_ob_poopart_use&quot;:&quot;yes&quot;,&quot;_ob_shadough_use&quot;:&quot;no&quot;,&quot;_ob_allow_hoveranimator&quot;:&quot;no&quot;}\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>On 30 April 2026, the internationally recognized publishing house Cambridge University Press published a collective monograph \u201cThe Cambridge Handbook of AI and Technologies in Courts\u201d, which was led by researchers from the Law Institute of the Lithuanian Centre for Social Sciences (hereinafter \u2013 the Law Institute). In this book, 72 authors from 25 countries examine the use of AI and digital technologies in courts across domestic and regional jurisdictions in Europe, North and South America, the Asia-Pacific region, and Africa. Among the contributors are representatives from Lithuania, including the Law Institute and Vilnius University.<\/p>\n<p>In many countries (from Brazil to Poland and Lithuania), artificial intelligence is increasingly being used in courts, particularly for auxiliary technical tasks such as transcribing court hearings, assisting with the anonymisation of judgments, and similar functions. There are also already initial attempts to apply the capabilities of artificial intelligence in judicial work, including analysing case materials and assisting in the drafting and adoption of court decisions. It is hoped that these innovations will help reduce workloads, especially where resources are limited and court caseloads are overwhelming.<\/p>\n<p>In this Handbook, scholars, judges, policymakers, legal professionals, and technologists from more than 60 different international academic institutions, public administration, and business organisations provide an interdisciplinary and cross-jurisdictional perspective on how artificial intelligence is deployed in courts, what legal and practical challenges this raises, and how judicial institutions are responding to the opportunities and risks posed by AI use in courts<\/p>\n<p>The central insight that emerges from the forty-five chapters of this Handbook is that the impact of AI on courts cannot be understood merely as a question of technological progress or administrative modernisation. When AI is used by judges, this is a question about the future of justice. The deployment of AI in judicial systems touches the very foundations of the rule of law, fundamental rights, democratic accountability, institutional legitimacy, and public trust, and requires us to rethink the very nature of courts. If AI systems are used not only to assist the court\u2018s administrative tasks but to take judicial decisions \u2013 if \u2018robo-judging\u2019 moves from science fiction to reality \u2013 then we must ask: what remains of the judicial function?<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, each chapter examines not just how AI can be deployed in courts, but also what courts must do to ensure that AI tools enhance, rather than erode judicial values, justice and the rule of law.\nThe editors of this internationally significant publication \u2013 Dr. Monika \u017dalnieri\u016bt\u0117 and Dr. Agn\u0117 Limant\u0117, senior researchers at the Law Institute \u2013 note that upon completing the book it became clear that the future of courts and AI is not a question of \u201cif\u201d, but \u201chow\u201d. The integration of AI and digital technologies into courts is no longer theoretical, peripheral, or experimental \u2013 it is global, active, and transformative<\/p>\n<p>The preparation of this book was supported by the Research Council of Lithuania under the project Artificial Intelligence in Courts: Challenges and Opportunities (TeismAI), agreement number: S-MIP-23-73.<\/p>\n<p>The book can be accessed here: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/books\/cambridge-handbook-of-ai-and-technologies-in-courts\/C16E665E36D28143B92988D28D7A12BF\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/books\/cambridge-handbook-of-ai-and-technologies-in-courts\/C16E665E36D28143B92988D28D7A12BF<\/a><\/p>\n<p>.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>2026\u00a0m. baland\u017eio 30\u00a0d. tarptautiniu mastu pripa\u017einta leidykla \u201eCambridge University Press\u201c publikavo Lietuvos socialini\u0173 moksl\u0173 centro Teis\u0117s instituto (toliau\u00a0\u2013 LSMC Teis\u0117s institutas) mokslininki\u0173 parengt\u0105 kolektyvin\u0119 monografij\u0105 \u201eThe Cambridge Handbook of AI and Technologies in Courts\u201c. \u0160ioje knygoje 72 autoriai i\u0161 25 \u0161ali\u0173 nagrin\u0117ja dirbtinio intelekto ir skaitmenini\u0173 technologij\u0173 naudojim\u0105 teismuose nacionalin\u0117se ir regionin\u0117se jurisdikcijose Europoje, \u0160iaur\u0117s ir Piet\u0173 Amerikoje, Azijos ir Ramiojo vandenyno regione bei Afrikoje. Tarp knygos autori\u0173\u00a0\u2013 ir Lietuvos atstovai i\u0161 LSMC Teis\u0117s instituto ir Vilniaus universiteto. Daugelyje \u0161ali\u0173 (nuo Brazilijos iki Lenkijos ir Lietuvos) dirbtinis intelektas vis da\u017eniau pasitelkiamas teismuose, ypa\u010d pagalbin\u0117ms techninio pob\u016bd\u017eio u\u017eduotims, tokioms kaip teismo pos\u0117d\u017eiams transkribuoti, pad\u0117ti anonimizuoti sprendimus ir pan. Taip pat jau galima rasti ir pirm\u0173j\u0173 bandym\u0173 taikyti dirbtinio intelekto galimybes teis\u0117j\u0173 darbe, analizuojant bylos med\u017eiag\u0105, rengiant ir priimant teisminius sprendimus. Viliamasi, kad \u0161ios inovacijos pad\u0117s ma\u017einti darbo kr\u016bv\u012f, ypa\u010d ten, kur i\u0161tekliai yra riboti, o teism\u0173 apkrova\u00a0\u2013 itin didel\u0117. \u0160ioje knygoje mokslininkai, teis\u0117jai, teis\u0117s praktikai ir technologij\u0173 specialistai i\u0161 daugiau nei 60-ies skirting\u0173 u\u017esienio mokslo institucij\u0173, vald\u017eios \u012fstaig\u0173 ir verslo \u012fmoni\u0173 pateikia tarpdisciplinin\u0119 ir skirting\u0173 jurisdikcij\u0173 perspektyv\u0105 apie tai, kaip dirbtinis intelektas naudojamas teismuose, koki\u0173 teisini\u0173 ir praktini\u0173 klausim\u0173 jis kelia, kaip teism\u0173 institucijos reaguoja \u012f dirbtinio intelekto teikiamas galimybes ir keliamas rizikas. Pagrindin\u0117 \u012f\u017evalga, i\u0161ry\u0161k\u0117janti i\u0161 keturiasde\u0161imt penki\u0173 \u0161io leidinio skyri\u0173, yra ta, kad dirbtinio intelekto poveikio teismams negalima vertinti vien tik kaip technologin\u0117s pa\u017eangos ar administracinio modernizavimo proceso. Dirbtinio intelekto pasitelkimas teis\u0117jo darbe\u00a0\u2013 tai klausimas apie teisingumo ateit\u012f. Dirbtinio intelekto diegimas teismin\u0117se sistemose palie\u010dia pa\u010dius teisin\u0117s valstyb\u0117s pagrindus, pagrindines asmens teises, demokratin\u0119 atskaitomyb\u0119, institucij\u0173 legitimum\u0105, visuomen\u0117s pasitik\u0117jim\u0105 ir ver\u010dia i\u0161 naujo perm\u0105styti pa\u010di\u0105 teism\u0173 prigimt\u012f. Jei dirbtinio intelekto sistemos naudojamos ne tik kaip pagalbinis, bet ir sprendim\u0173 pri\u0117mimo \u012frankis, jei \u201erobotinis teis\u0117javimas\u201c i\u0161 mokslin\u0117s fantastikos pereina \u012f realyb\u0119\u00a0\u2013 tuomet turime klausti: kas lieka i\u0161 teismin\u0117s funkcijos? Tod\u0117l kiekviename skyriuje nagrin\u0117jama ne tik tai, k\u0105 dirbtinis intelektas gali pakeisti teismuose, bet ir tai, k\u0105 patys teismai turi daryti, kad dirbtinio intelekto priemon\u0117s stiprint\u0173, o ne silpnint\u0173 teismines vertybes, teisingum\u0105 ir teisin\u0119 valstyb\u0119. \u0160ios pasauliniu mastu reik\u0161mingos publikacijos mokslin\u0117s redaktor\u0117s\u00a0\u2013 LSMC Teis\u0117s instituto vyriausiosios mokslo darbuotojos dr.\u00a0Monika \u017dalnieri\u016bt\u0117 ir dr.\u00a0Agn\u0117 Limant\u0117\u00a0\u2013 teigia, jog parengus knyg\u0105 tapo akivaizdu: teism\u0173 ir dirbtinio intelekto ateitis\u00a0\u2013 tai ne klausimas \u201ear\u201c, bet \u201ekaip\u201c. Dirbtinio intelekto ir skaitmenini\u0173 technologij\u0173 integracija \u012f teismus neb\u0117ra teorin\u0117, periferin\u0117 ar eksperimentin\u0117\u00a0\u2013 ji yra pasaulin\u0117, aktyvi ir transformuojanti. Kolektyvin\u0117 monografija publikuota LSMC Teis\u0117s institutui \u012fgyvendinant projekt\u0105 \u201eDirbtinis intelektas teismuose: i\u0161\u0161u\u0304kiai ir galimyb\u0117s (TeismAI)\u201c, kur\u012f finansavo Lietuvos mokslo taryba, sutarties Nr.\u00a0S-MIP-23-73. Su knyga galima susipa\u017einti \u010dia \u2013 https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/books\/cambridge-handbook-of-ai-and-technologies-in-courts\/C16E665E36D28143B92988D28D7A12BF .<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":21843,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,268],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21839","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-naujienos","category-268"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21839","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21839"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21839\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21847,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21839\/revisions\/21847"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/21843"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21839"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21839"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21839"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}