{"id":2751,"date":"2018-01-30T11:19:05","date_gmt":"2018-01-30T08:19:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/teise.org\/?p=2751"},"modified":"2023-02-10T17:20:52","modified_gmt":"2023-02-10T17:20:52","slug":"kodel-nuteistuju-socialine-reabilitacija-ne-visada-sekminga","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/kodel-nuteistuju-socialine-reabilitacija-ne-visada-sekminga\/","title":{"rendered":"Kod\u0117l nuteist\u0173j\u0173 socialin\u0117 reabilitacija ne visada s\u0117kminga?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>[:lt]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Lietuvos teis\u0117s instituto (LTI) mokslininkai, vykdydami Teisingumo ministerijos program\u0105, atliko nuteist\u0173j\u0173 socialin\u0117s reabilitacijos priemoni\u0173 sistemos tyrim\u0105 bei pateik\u0117 savo i\u0161vadas, atkreipdami d\u0117mes\u012f \u012f probleminius aspektus.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dr. R\u016bta Vai\u010di\u016bnien\u0117 bei dr. Vaidas Vir\u0161ilas atlikto tyrimo rezultatus paskelb\u0117 mokslo studijoje \u201eLaisv\u0117s at\u0117mimo vietose taikom\u0173 socialin\u0117s reabilitacijos priemoni\u0173 sistemos analiz\u0117, probleminiai taikymo aspektai\u201c.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">LTI mokslinink\u0173 atlikta Lietuvos laisv\u0117s at\u0117mimo vietose taikom\u0173 priemoni\u0173 analiz\u0117 atskleid\u0117 kelet\u0105 svarbiausi\u0173 problemini\u0173 sri\u010di\u0173. Pirma \u2013 socialin\u0117s reabilitacijos b\u016brio vir\u0161ininkams tenka daug funkcij\u0173, numatytas didelis darbo kr\u016bvis, tod\u0117l jiems ne\u012fmanoma savo darbe taikyti korekcini\u0173 program\u0173. Mokslininkai, atlik\u0119 tyrim\u0105, mano, kad yra b\u016btinas b\u016brio vir\u0161inink\u0173 funkcij\u0173 perskirstymas.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kitas probleminis aspektas &#8211; b\u016brio vir\u0161ininkai n\u0117ra motyvuoti dirbti su programomis, kadangi papras\u010diausiai netiki j\u0173 veiksmingumu.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Socialin\u0117s reabilitacijos b\u016bri\u0173 vir\u0161ininkai taip pat nejau\u010dia laisv\u0117s at\u0117mimo viet\u0173 administracijos palaikymo taikyti korekcines programas, kadangi kitoms priemon\u0117ms (darbui ir kt.) socialin\u0117s reabilitacijos procese teikiamas prioritetas.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ketvirta problema, su kuria susiduriama \u2013 neilgas laiko tarpas, skirtas individualaus socialin\u0117s reabilitacijos plano sudarymui. Tai didina laisv\u0117s at\u0117mimo viet\u0173 personalo ir teis\u0117s pa\u017eeid\u0117j\u0173 frustracij\u0105 bei klaid\u0173, planuojant veiksmingas socialin\u0117s reabilitacijos priemones, atsiradimo tikimyb\u0119.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201eKal\u0117jim\u0173 departamento pastangos pereiti nuo neefektyvios ir atgyvenusios bausmi\u0173 sistemos, grind\u017eiamos atpildo, bauginimo ir izoliavimo siekiais, prie moksliniais tyrimais pagr\u012fstos progresyvios ir efektyvios korekcin\u0117s sistemos ai\u0161kiai jau\u010diamos, ta\u010diau socialin\u0117s reabilitacijos procese vis dar tr\u016bksta kryptingumo, sistemi\u0161kumo ir nuoseklumo\u201c, &#8211; ra\u0161o mokslininkai savo parengtos studijos i\u0161vadose.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mokslininkai apibendrinami pa\u017eym\u0117jo, kad taikant socialin\u0117s reabilitacijos priemones laisv\u0117s at\u0117mimo vietose svarbu orientuotis \u012f \u0161iuo metu jau turim\u0173 veiksmingiausi\u0173 priemoni\u0173 \u012fgyvendinimo kokyb\u0119 ir sudaryti galimybes personalui patik\u0117ti \u0161i\u0173 priemoni\u0173 veiksmingumu.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mokslo darbe akcentuojama, kad nuteist\u0173 asmen\u0173 socialin\u0117 reabilitacija, resocializacija ir integracija \u012f visuomen\u0119 neatsiejama \u0161iuolaikin\u0117s bausm\u0117s sampratos dalis, \u012ftvirtinta tiek ES lygmeniu ar nacionaliniuose strateginiuose dokumentuose, tiek mokslini\u0173 tyrim\u0173 lauke. S\u0117kmingai resocializacijai b\u016btinas kompleksas element\u0173, pradedant sisteminiu po\u017ei\u016briu, instituciniu palaikymu ar teisine baze, baigiant kokybi\u0161kai \u012fgyvendinamomis korekcin\u0117mis programomis ir j\u0173 t\u0105sa. Progresyvi\u0173 \u0161ali\u0173 (\u0160iaur\u0117s \u0161alys, Jungtin\u0117 Karalyst\u0117, Kanada, JAV ir kt.) pavyzdys rodo, kad veiksminga laisv\u0117s at\u0117mimo bausm\u0119 atliekan\u010di\u0173 asmen\u0173 socialin\u0117 reabilitacija prasideda nuo vis\u0173 suinteresuot\u0173j\u0173 \u0161ali\u0173 \u2013 baud\u017eiamosios politikos formuotoj\u0173, j\u0105 \u012fgyvendinan\u010di\u0173 institucij\u0173, bendruomen\u0117s \u2013 vieningumo, sutarimo ir bendradarbiavimo.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Visas mokslo darbo tekstas nemokamai skelbiamas LTI interneto svetain\u0117je<span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"> <a href=\"http:\/\/teise.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/Vai\u010di\u016bnuien\u0117-Vir\u0161ilas.pdf\">http:\/\/teise.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/Vai\u010di\u016bnuien\u0117-Vir\u0161ilas.pdf<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p>[:en]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The scientists of the Law Institute of Lithuania (LIL) conducted the investigation \u201cThe implementation and application of social rehabilitation in Lithuanian correctional facilities\u201d under the programme of The Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Lithuania. The aim of the investigation was\u00a0to provide the findings and to note the main challenges about the implementation and application of social rehabilitation in Lithuanian correctional facilities. The authors of this publication Dr. R\u016bta Vai\u010di\u016bnien\u0117 and Dr. Vaidas Vai\u0161vilas emphasize, that the required tools for social rehabilitation in Lithuanian correctional facilities are available, however, the quality of its implementation monitoring and evaluation should be improved.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Contemporary evidence based penal systems and sanctions are inseparable from the goals of offenders\u2018 social rehabilitation, resocialization and reintegration into society. In accordance with modern theoretical approaches (Risk \u2013 Need \u2013 Responsivity Model and Good Life Model) and best practice (for instance Scandinavian penal system), correctional interventions contribute correctional interventions require eligible attention in their constant monitoring of implementation and evaluation. \u00a0<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Although the ideas of resocialization are maintained in international documents (developed by the European Commission and the United Nations), Lithuania still can be referred to those countries, which have to humanize conditions of confinement, and improve process of offenders\u2019 social rehabilitation. In Lithuania imprisonment is frequently and intensely applied, according to the rates of incarceration, Lithuania is one of the leading countries in Europe and the length of imprisonment is counted by years, meanwhile, in the Western countries it consists of a few months. Long prison sentences complicates inmates\u2019 integration. Harsher punishments and penalties don\u2019t deter offenders from committing crimes, furthermore long-term prison sentences complicate offender re-entry and return to the community.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">As has been argued elsewhere process of social rehabilitation in Lithuanian correctional facilities is inconsistent, lacks an integrity, an evident and coherent direction. Though reports focusing on the analysis of social rehabilitation prepared by prisons\u2019 administrators introduce various correctional programs, there is no knowledge about quality of its implementation, procedures of evaluation and treatment effectiveness. Hence, the aim of this study is using theoretical literature, various reports and semi structured interviews to analyze correctional interventions programs in Lithuanian penitentiary institutions and to reveal different problematic issues of its implementation and quality.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The research reveals that specialists of social rehabilitation section in Lithuanian prisons have too many duties and responsibilities, which are unrelated with correctional programing; it complicates implementation and quality of correctional interventions. Rethinking and redistribution of social workers\u2019 duties and functions is a necessary improvement. Moreover, research shows that specialists of social rehabilitation section are unmotivated and do not believe in interventions\u2019 effectiveness, because they lack support from prison administration and authorities. Finally, the term for preparation of individual social rehabilitation plan is to short, it leads to growing frustration on both sides: specialists of social rehabilitation and prisoners. Therefore, we suggest creating system of prisons\u2019 staff motivation and support, and getting opportunity to participate in correctional programs\u2019 training and supervision regularly.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The prison department efforts to develop evidence based correctional programing are very promising; however, some major changes are required. There is a lack of clear monitoring and evaluation system. The effects and quality of approved correctional programs must be evaluated. The research reveals that human resources are used intensively however results of social rehabilitation are unclear and unmeasured. A significant number of unapproved programs is applied, though content and effects of these programs are unknown. Therefore, after evaluation these programs have to be approved or eliminated.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The\u00a0full text of the research in Lithuanian language is available on the following website: <a href=\"http:\/\/teise.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/Vai%C4%8Di%C5%ABnuien%C4%97-Vir%C5%A1ilas.pdf\">http:\/\/teise.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/Vai\u010di\u016bnuien\u0117-Vir\u0161ilas.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p>[:]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[:lt] Lietuvos teis\u0117s instituto (LTI) mokslininkai, vykdydami Teisingumo ministerijos program\u0105, atliko nuteist\u0173j\u0173 socialin\u0117s reabilitacijos priemoni\u0173 sistemos tyrim\u0105 bei pateik\u0117 savo i\u0161vadas, atkreipdami d\u0117mes\u012f \u012f probleminius aspektus. Dr. R\u016bta Vai\u010di\u016bnien\u0117 bei dr. Vaidas Vir\u0161ilas atlikto tyrimo rezultatus paskelb\u0117 mokslo studijoje \u201eLaisv\u0117s at\u0117mimo vietose taikom\u0173 socialin\u0117s reabilitacijos priemoni\u0173 sistemos analiz\u0117, probleminiai taikymo aspektai\u201c. LTI mokslinink\u0173 atlikta Lietuvos laisv\u0117s at\u0117mimo vietose taikom\u0173 priemoni\u0173 analiz\u0117 atskleid\u0117 kelet\u0105 svarbiausi\u0173 problemini\u0173 sri\u010di\u0173. Pirma \u2013 socialin\u0117s reabilitacijos b\u016brio vir\u0161ininkams tenka daug funkcij\u0173, numatytas didelis darbo kr\u016bvis, tod\u0117l jiems ne\u012fmanoma savo darbe taikyti korekcini\u0173 program\u0173. Mokslininkai, atlik\u0119 tyrim\u0105, mano, kad yra b\u016btinas b\u016brio vir\u0161inink\u0173 funkcij\u0173 perskirstymas. Kitas probleminis aspektas &#8211; b\u016brio vir\u0161ininkai n\u0117ra motyvuoti dirbti su programomis, kadangi papras\u010diausiai netiki j\u0173 veiksmingumu. Socialin\u0117s reabilitacijos b\u016bri\u0173 vir\u0161ininkai taip pat nejau\u010dia laisv\u0117s at\u0117mimo viet\u0173 administracijos palaikymo taikyti korekcines programas, kadangi kitoms priemon\u0117ms (darbui ir kt.) socialin\u0117s reabilitacijos procese teikiamas prioritetas. Ketvirta problema, su kuria susiduriama \u2013 neilgas laiko tarpas, skirtas individualaus socialin\u0117s reabilitacijos plano sudarymui. Tai didina laisv\u0117s at\u0117mimo viet\u0173 personalo ir teis\u0117s pa\u017eeid\u0117j\u0173 frustracij\u0105 bei klaid\u0173, planuojant veiksmingas socialin\u0117s reabilitacijos priemones, atsiradimo tikimyb\u0119. \u201eKal\u0117jim\u0173 departamento pastangos pereiti nuo neefektyvios ir atgyvenusios bausmi\u0173 sistemos, grind\u017eiamos atpildo, bauginimo ir izoliavimo siekiais, prie moksliniais tyrimais pagr\u012fstos progresyvios ir efektyvios korekcin\u0117s sistemos ai\u0161kiai jau\u010diamos, ta\u010diau socialin\u0117s reabilitacijos procese vis dar tr\u016bksta kryptingumo, sistemi\u0161kumo ir nuoseklumo\u201c, &#8211; ra\u0161o mokslininkai savo parengtos studijos i\u0161vadose. Mokslininkai apibendrinami pa\u017eym\u0117jo, kad taikant socialin\u0117s reabilitacijos priemones laisv\u0117s at\u0117mimo vietose svarbu orientuotis \u012f \u0161iuo metu jau turim\u0173 veiksmingiausi\u0173 priemoni\u0173 \u012fgyvendinimo kokyb\u0119 ir sudaryti galimybes personalui patik\u0117ti \u0161i\u0173 priemoni\u0173 veiksmingumu. Mokslo darbe akcentuojama, kad nuteist\u0173 asmen\u0173 socialin\u0117 reabilitacija, resocializacija ir integracija \u012f visuomen\u0119 neatsiejama \u0161iuolaikin\u0117s bausm\u0117s sampratos dalis, \u012ftvirtinta tiek ES lygmeniu ar nacionaliniuose strateginiuose dokumentuose, tiek mokslini\u0173 tyrim\u0173 lauke. S\u0117kmingai resocializacijai b\u016btinas kompleksas element\u0173, pradedant sisteminiu po\u017ei\u016briu, instituciniu palaikymu ar teisine baze, baigiant kokybi\u0161kai \u012fgyvendinamomis korekcin\u0117mis programomis ir j\u0173 t\u0105sa. Progresyvi\u0173 \u0161ali\u0173 (\u0160iaur\u0117s \u0161alys, Jungtin\u0117 Karalyst\u0117, Kanada, JAV ir kt.) pavyzdys rodo, kad veiksminga laisv\u0117s at\u0117mimo bausm\u0119 atliekan\u010di\u0173 asmen\u0173 socialin\u0117 reabilitacija prasideda nuo vis\u0173 suinteresuot\u0173j\u0173 \u0161ali\u0173 \u2013 baud\u017eiamosios politikos formuotoj\u0173, j\u0105 \u012fgyvendinan\u010di\u0173 institucij\u0173, bendruomen\u0117s \u2013 vieningumo, sutarimo ir bendradarbiavimo. Visas mokslo darbo tekstas nemokamai skelbiamas LTI interneto svetain\u0117je http:\/\/teise.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/Vai\u010di\u016bnuien\u0117-Vir\u0161ilas.pdf [:en] The scientists of the Law Institute of Lithuania (LIL) conducted the investigation \u201cThe implementation and application of social rehabilitation in Lithuanian correctional facilities\u201d under the programme of The Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Lithuania. The aim of the investigation was\u00a0to provide the findings and to note the main challenges about the implementation and application of social rehabilitation in Lithuanian correctional facilities. The authors of this publication Dr. R\u016bta Vai\u010di\u016bnien\u0117 and Dr. Vaidas Vai\u0161vilas emphasize, that the required tools for social rehabilitation in Lithuanian correctional facilities are available, however, the quality of its implementation monitoring and evaluation should be improved. Contemporary evidence based penal systems and sanctions are inseparable from the goals of offenders\u2018 social rehabilitation, resocialization and reintegration into society. In accordance with modern theoretical approaches (Risk \u2013 Need \u2013 Responsivity Model and Good Life Model) and best practice (for instance Scandinavian penal system), correctional interventions contribute correctional interventions require eligible attention in their constant monitoring of implementation and evaluation. \u00a0 Although the ideas of resocialization are maintained in international documents (developed by the European Commission and the United Nations), Lithuania still can be referred to those countries, which have to humanize conditions of confinement, and improve process of offenders\u2019 social rehabilitation. In Lithuania imprisonment is frequently and intensely applied, according to the rates of incarceration, Lithuania is one of the leading countries in Europe and the length of imprisonment is counted by years, meanwhile, in the Western countries it consists of a few months. Long prison sentences complicates inmates\u2019 integration. Harsher punishments and penalties don\u2019t deter offenders from committing crimes, furthermore long-term prison sentences complicate offender re-entry and return to the community. As has been argued elsewhere process of social rehabilitation in Lithuanian correctional facilities is inconsistent, lacks an integrity, an evident and coherent direction. Though reports focusing on the analysis of social rehabilitation prepared by prisons\u2019 administrators introduce various correctional programs, there is no knowledge about quality of its implementation, procedures of evaluation and treatment effectiveness. Hence, the aim of this study is using theoretical literature, various reports and semi structured interviews to analyze correctional interventions programs in Lithuanian penitentiary institutions and to reveal different problematic issues of its implementation and quality. The research reveals that specialists of social rehabilitation section in Lithuanian prisons have too many duties and responsibilities, which are unrelated with correctional programing; it complicates implementation and quality of correctional interventions. Rethinking and redistribution of social workers\u2019 duties and functions is a necessary improvement. Moreover, research shows that specialists of social rehabilitation section are unmotivated and do not believe in interventions\u2019 effectiveness, because they lack support from prison administration and authorities. Finally, the term for preparation of individual social rehabilitation plan is to short, it leads to growing frustration on both sides: specialists of social rehabilitation and prisoners. Therefore, we suggest creating system of prisons\u2019 staff motivation and support, and getting opportunity to participate in correctional programs\u2019 training and supervision regularly. The prison department efforts to develop evidence based correctional programing are very promising; however, some major changes are required. There is a lack of clear monitoring and evaluation system. The effects and quality of approved correctional programs must be evaluated. The research reveals that human resources are used intensively however results of social rehabilitation are unclear and unmeasured. A significant number of unapproved programs is applied, though content and effects of these programs are unknown. Therefore, after evaluation these programs have to be approved or eliminated. The\u00a0full text of the research in Lithuanian language is available on the following website: http:\/\/teise.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/Vai\u010di\u016bnuien\u0117-Vir\u0161ilas.pdf [:]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2752,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,261],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2751","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-naujienos","category-2018-naujienu-irasu-metai"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2751","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2751"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2751\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6826,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2751\/revisions\/6826"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2752"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2751"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2751"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2751"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}