http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/jcms.12692\/full<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n[:]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
[:lt] Jungtin\u0117je Karalyst\u0117je leid\u017eiamas ir auk\u0161t\u0105 Impact Factor turintis mokslo \u017eurnalas \u201eJournal of Common Market Studies\u201c paskelb\u0117 Lietuvos teis\u0117s instituto (LTI) mokslinink\u0117s dr.\u00a0Agn\u0117s Limant\u0117s parengt\u0105 knygos ap\u017evalg\u0105. Mokslinink\u0117 ap\u017evelg\u0117 Dorte Sindbjergo Martinseno knyg\u0105 \u201eAn Ever More Powerful Court? The Political Constraints of Legal Integration in the European Union\u201c (liet. \u201eVis galingesnis teismas? Politiniai teisin\u0117s integracijos Europos S\u0105jungoje apribojimai\u201c). Mokslinink\u0117 pastebi, jog neretai lyg savaime suprantam\u0105 ties\u0105 mes priimame teigin\u012f, kad Europos S\u0105jungos Teisingumo Teismas (ESTT) atlieka itin reik\u0161ming\u0105 vaidmen\u012f skatinant Europos integracijos proces\u0105 ir turi itin didel\u0119 reik\u0161m\u0119 ES politikai ir teis\u0117s aktams. Ta\u010diau ar i\u0161 ties\u0173 \u0161is Teismas toks galingas? Ar jo sprendimai visuomet daro \u012ftak\u0105 teis\u0117k\u016brai? Kaip ir ar visuomet ESTT sprendimai atsispindi antriniuose teis\u0117s aktuose? \u012e \u0161iuos klausimus siekia atsakyti ap\u017evelgiama Dorte Sindbjergo Martinseno knyga. \u201eAutorius kvie\u010dia mus pa\u017evelgti giliau, sudvejoti savo \u012fsitikinimais ir si\u016blo detaliau panagrin\u0117ti ES teis\u0117k\u016bros institucij\u0173 ir ESTT sprendim\u0173 santyk\u012f per konkre\u010dius pavyzd\u017eius\u201c, \u2013 ra\u0161o LTI mokslinink\u0117 ap\u017evalgoje. Anot mokslinink\u0117s, knyga yra \u012f\u017evalgi ir teori\u0161kai, ir empiri\u0161kai. Knygos autorius pasirinko tris sritis, kuriose i\u0161samiai i\u0161nagrin\u0117jo ESTT sprendim\u0173 ir teis\u0117s akt\u0173 s\u0105veik\u0105: ES darbo laiko reguliavim\u0105, ES pilie\u010di\u0173 teises \u012f sveikatos prie\u017ei\u016bros paslaugas kitoje ES \u0161alyje ir komandiruot\u0173 darbuotoj\u0173 reglamentavim\u0105. Nuoseklia analize autorius pagrind\u017eia, kad ESTT visgi n\u0117ra tokia \u012ftakinga politik\u0105 formuojanti institucija, kaip neretai manoma. Vis\u0105 knygos ap\u017evalg\u0105 galima rasti \u010dia: http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/jcms.12692\/full [:en] The Journal of Common Market Studies, a scientific journal with a high impact factor that is published in the United Kingdom, recently published a book review written by the Law Institute of Lithuania (hereinafter \u2013 LIL) researcher dr. Agn\u0117 Limant\u0117. The researcher reviewed a book An Ever More Powerful Court? The Political Constraints of Legal Integration in the European Union by Dorte Sindbjerg Martinsen. The researcher notes that we often take it for granted that the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) plays a very important role in promoting the process of European integration and is of particular importance to EU policies and legislation. But is this Court really that powerful? Do its judgments always impact law-making? Are the judgments of the CJEU always reflected in secondary legislation, and how? These are the questions that were addressed in Dorte Sindbjerg Martinsen\u2019s book. \u201cThe author invites us to take a deeper look and question our convictions; he proposes a more detailed analysis of the relationship between EU legislative bodies and the judgments of the CJEU through concrete examples,\u201d writes the LIL researcher in the review. According to researcher, the book is insightful both theoretically and empirically. The author of the book chose three areas to examine the interaction between the judgments of the CJEU and EU legislative bodies: EU working time regulation, the rights of EU citizens to healthcare in another EU country, and the regulation of posted workers. Through systematic analysis, the author argues that the CJEU is actually not such an influential policy-making body as is often assumed. The full book review can be found here: http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1111\/jcms.12692\/full [:]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2768,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,261],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2767","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-naujienos","category-2018-naujienu-irasu-metai"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2767","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2767"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2767\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6822,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2767\/revisions\/6822"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2768"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2767"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2767"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2767"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}