https:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/full\/10.1080\/17441048.2018.1442128<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n[:]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
[:lt] Lietuvos teis\u0117s instituto mokslinink\u0117 Agn\u0117 Limant\u0117 publikavo mokslo straipsn\u012f pripa\u017eintame tarptautiniame leidinyje \u201eJournal of Private International Law\u201c. Mokslinink\u0117 \u017eurnale paskelb\u0117 savo darb\u0105 \u201eSuaugusi\u0173j\u0173 nuolatin\u0117s gyvenamosios vietos nustatymas pagal reglament\u0105 \u201eBriuselis\u00a0IIa\u201c: nacionalin\u0117s teism\u0173 praktikos pavyzd\u017eiai\u201c. Jame analizuojama suaugusi\u0173j\u0173 nuolatin\u0117s gyvenamosios vietos s\u0105voka reglamento \u201eBriuselis IIa\u201c kontekste. Publikacijoje daugiausia d\u0117mesio skiriama Europos S\u0105jungos (ES) valstybi\u0173 nari\u0173 nacionalini\u0173 teism\u0173 geriausiajai praktikai. Straipsnyje ne tik kalbama apie \u0161ios svarbios ES teis\u0117s s\u0105vokos ai\u0161kinim\u0105 skirting\u0173 ES valstybi\u0173 teismuose, bet ir atskleid\u017eiama keletas bendr\u0173 tendencij\u0173, leid\u017eian\u010di\u0173 teigti, kad jurisprudencijoje formuojasi vienoda \u012fprastin\u0117s gyvenamosios vietos samprata. A. Limant\u0117s publikacijoje teigiama, kad nors ir nesant ai\u0161ki\u0173 Europos S\u0105jungos Teisingumo Teismo gairi\u0173 d\u0117l suaugusio asmens nuolatin\u0117s gyvenamosios vietos nustatymo pagal reglament\u0105 \u201eBriuselis\u00a0IIa\u201c (daug daugiau d\u0117mesio skirta vaiko nuolatin\u0117s gyvenamosios vietos s\u0105vokai), skirting\u0173 nacionalini\u0173 teism\u0173 praktika visgi formuoja gana vienod\u0105 s\u0105vokos ai\u0161kinim\u0105. Besidomintieji straipsn\u012f gali rasti \u010dia: https:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/full\/10.1080\/17441048.2018.1442128 [:en] Dr. Agn\u0117 Limant\u0117, a researcher of the Law Institute of Lithuania, has published a scientific article in an acknowledged international publication \u201cJournal of Private International Law\u201d. The researcher\u2019s work is entitled \u201cEstablishing habitual residence of adults under the Brussels IIa regulation: best practices from national case-law\u201d. It analyses the concept of habitual residence of adults in the context of the Brussels IIa regulation. The publication mainly focuses on the best practices of national courts of the EU Member States. The article not only examines the interpretation of this important EU law concept in the court of different EU Member States, but also discloses some common trends suggesting that a uniform notion of habitual residence has been forming in jurisprudence. The publication by Ms. Limant\u0117 claims that in the absence of clear advice from the Court of Justice of the European Union as to how habitual residence of an adult is to be established for the purposes of Brussels IIa (greater emphasis is placed on the notion of child\u2019s habitual residence), some useful guidance of rather uniform interpretation of the notion can nevertheless be inferred from diverse national case law. \u00a0 The article is available here: https:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/full\/10.1080\/17441048.2018.1442128 [:]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2942,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,261],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2941","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-naujienos","category-2018-naujienu-irasu-metai"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2941","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2941"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2941\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6800,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2941\/revisions\/6800"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2942"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2941"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2941"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2941"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}