[:lt]<\/p>\n
Lietuvos teis\u0117s instituto (LTI) mokslininkai rekomenduoja nepritarti reikalavimams nuomojamuose automobiliuose \u012frengti alkoblokus (automobilio u\u017evedim\u0105 blokuojan\u010dius alkotesterius).<\/p>\n
Seime po rezonansini\u0173 \u012fvyki\u0173 svarstomas Saugaus eismo automobili\u0173 keliais \u012fstatymo projektas, kuriame ketinama \u012ftvirtinti nauj\u0105 nuostat\u0105 d\u0117l alkoblok\u0173 \u012frengimo. \u012estatymo pataisa numato, kad \u201etransporto priemon\u0117je, kuri yra skirta nuomai ir kurios valdytoju yra automobili\u0173 nuomos paslaugas teikianti \u012fmon\u0117, privalomai turi b\u016bti \u012frengtas mechanizmas, leid\u017eiantis u\u017evesti varikl\u012f tik atlikus blaivumo test\u0105\u201c.<\/p>\n
LTI mokslininkai Seimo Teis\u0117s ir teis\u0117tvarkos komitetui pateik\u0117 savo i\u0161vad\u0105, kurioje pa\u017eymi, kad toks reguliavimas apsunkint\u0173 konkre\u010di\u0173 \u016bkio subjekt\u0173 \u2013 transporto priemoni\u0173 nuomos paslaugas teikian\u010di\u0173 \u012fmoni\u0173 \u2013 veikl\u0105. Nuomoti automobiliai sudaro tik nedidel\u0119 dal\u012f eisme dalyvaujan\u010di\u0173 transporto priemoni\u0173, be to, n\u0117ra statistini\u0173 duomen\u0173, kurie pagr\u012fst\u0173, jog b\u016btent su nuomotais automobiliais padaroma daugiau avarij\u0173 d\u0117l vairuotojo girtumo.<\/p>\n
\u201eSukurti papildomus reikalavimus vien tik nuomojam\u0173 transporto priemoni\u0173 grupei neb\u016bt\u0173 nuoseklu ir pagr\u012fsta. Tai b\u016bt\u0173 selektyvus reguliavimas (pasirenkamas tik vienas segmentas), o tai n\u0117ra tinkama\u201c, \u2013 ra\u0161oma Seimui pateiktoje mokslinink\u0173 i\u0161vadoje.<\/p>\n
LTI mokslininkai atkreipia d\u0117mes\u012f \u012f tai, kad vairuotojai, s\u0117dantys u\u017e vairo neblaiv\u016bs, tok\u012f pa\u017eeidim\u0105 da\u017eniausiai kartoja ne vien\u0105 kart\u0105. Tod\u0117l kur kas pagr\u012fs\u010diau b\u016bt\u0173 svarstyti alkoblok\u0173 \u012frengim\u0105 t\u0173 asmen\u0173 automobiliuose, kurie kart\u0105 jau buvo bausti u\u017e vairavim\u0105 i\u0161g\u0117rus. Tokio mechanizmo \u012frengimas gal\u0117t\u0173 b\u016bti aplinkyb\u0117, lengvinanti bausm\u0119 (pvz., teisi\u0173 at\u0117mimas gal\u0117t\u0173 b\u016bti nustatomas trumpesniam laikui, jei vairuotojas \u012fdiegt\u0173 tok\u012f mechanizm\u0105 savo naudojamoje transporto priemon\u0117je). Tokia praktika plinta Europoje (Austrijoje, Danijoje, Pranc\u016bzijoje, Olandijoje, Lenkijoje, \u0160vedijoje ir kt.), analogi\u0161kas reguliavimas jau rengiamas ir Lietuvoje.<\/p>\n
\u0160is projektas mokslininkams kelia abejoni\u0173 ir d\u0117l teisingos konkurencijos \u012fgyvendinimo. Pavyzd\u017eiui, subjektams, kurie teikia pav\u0117\u017e\u0117jimo paslaugas, reikalavimas \u012frengti mechanizmus, leid\u017eian\u010dius u\u017evesti varikl\u012f tik atlikus blaivumo test\u0105, neb\u016bt\u0173 taikomas ir tai potencialiai gal\u0117t\u0173 paveikti konkurencines rinkos s\u0105lygas.<\/p>\n
[:en]<\/p>\n
The researchers of the Law Institute of Lithuania (hereinafter \u2013 LIL) recommend not to approve of the requirements to install ignition interlock devices in rental cars.<\/p>\n
After resonant events, the Seimas has deliberated the draft Law on Road Traffic Safety in order to establish a new provision on installation of ignition interlock devices in cars. The amendment provides that \u201ca vehicle intended for rental, owned by a company that provides car rental services, must have a breath alcohol ignition interlock device installed\u201d.<\/p>\n
LIL researchers presented their conclusion to the Seimas Committee on Legal Affairs noting that such regulation would aggravate operation of specific economic entities \u2013 companies that provide vehicle rental services. Rented cars constitute only a small share of overall traffic; furthermore, there are no statistical data to substantiate a bigger number of car accidents due to drunk driving of rented cars.<\/p>\n
\u201cAdditional requirements for one group of rented vehicles would not be consistent and reasonable. That would be selective regulation (choosing only one segment), which is not suitable,\u201d states the researchers\u2019 conclusion presented to the Seimas.<\/p>\n
LIL researchers note that drunk drivers often repeat this infringement. Therefore, it would be much more reasonable to consider installation of ignition interlock devices in the cars of those persons who have already been punished for drunk driving. Installation of such a device could be the mitigating circumstance (e.g. the driving licence withdrawal period could be shorter if the driver installs such a device in his\/her used vehicle). Such practice has been spreading across Europe (Austria, Denmark, France, the Netherlands, Poland, Sweden, etc.), and analogical regulatory legislation has been drafted in Lithuania.<\/p>\n
This project also arouses doubts of researchers as to fair competition. For example, a requirement to install a breath alcohol ignition interlock devices would not be applied to entities that provide ride-sharing services and this could potentially affect competitive market conditions.<\/p>\n
[:]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
[:lt] Lietuvos teis\u0117s instituto (LTI) mokslininkai rekomenduoja nepritarti reikalavimams nuomojamuose automobiliuose \u012frengti alkoblokus (automobilio u\u017evedim\u0105 blokuojan\u010dius alkotesterius). Seime po rezonansini\u0173 \u012fvyki\u0173 svarstomas Saugaus eismo automobili\u0173 keliais \u012fstatymo projektas, kuriame ketinama \u012ftvirtinti nauj\u0105 nuostat\u0105 d\u0117l alkoblok\u0173 \u012frengimo. \u012estatymo pataisa numato, kad \u201etransporto priemon\u0117je, kuri yra skirta nuomai ir kurios valdytoju yra automobili\u0173 nuomos paslaugas teikianti \u012fmon\u0117, privalomai turi b\u016bti \u012frengtas mechanizmas, leid\u017eiantis u\u017evesti varikl\u012f tik atlikus blaivumo test\u0105\u201c. LTI mokslininkai Seimo Teis\u0117s ir teis\u0117tvarkos komitetui pateik\u0117 savo i\u0161vad\u0105, kurioje pa\u017eymi, kad toks reguliavimas apsunkint\u0173 konkre\u010di\u0173 \u016bkio subjekt\u0173 \u2013 transporto priemoni\u0173 nuomos paslaugas teikian\u010di\u0173 \u012fmoni\u0173 \u2013 veikl\u0105. Nuomoti automobiliai sudaro tik nedidel\u0119 dal\u012f eisme dalyvaujan\u010di\u0173 transporto priemoni\u0173, be to, n\u0117ra statistini\u0173 duomen\u0173, kurie pagr\u012fst\u0173, jog b\u016btent su nuomotais automobiliais padaroma daugiau avarij\u0173 d\u0117l vairuotojo girtumo. \u201eSukurti papildomus reikalavimus vien tik nuomojam\u0173 transporto priemoni\u0173 grupei neb\u016bt\u0173 nuoseklu ir pagr\u012fsta. Tai b\u016bt\u0173 selektyvus reguliavimas (pasirenkamas tik vienas segmentas), o tai n\u0117ra tinkama\u201c, \u2013 ra\u0161oma Seimui pateiktoje mokslinink\u0173 i\u0161vadoje. LTI mokslininkai atkreipia d\u0117mes\u012f \u012f tai, kad vairuotojai, s\u0117dantys u\u017e vairo neblaiv\u016bs, tok\u012f pa\u017eeidim\u0105 da\u017eniausiai kartoja ne vien\u0105 kart\u0105. Tod\u0117l kur kas pagr\u012fs\u010diau b\u016bt\u0173 svarstyti alkoblok\u0173 \u012frengim\u0105 t\u0173 asmen\u0173 automobiliuose, kurie kart\u0105 jau buvo bausti u\u017e vairavim\u0105 i\u0161g\u0117rus. Tokio mechanizmo \u012frengimas gal\u0117t\u0173 b\u016bti aplinkyb\u0117, lengvinanti bausm\u0119 (pvz., teisi\u0173 at\u0117mimas gal\u0117t\u0173 b\u016bti nustatomas trumpesniam laikui, jei vairuotojas \u012fdiegt\u0173 tok\u012f mechanizm\u0105 savo naudojamoje transporto priemon\u0117je). Tokia praktika plinta Europoje (Austrijoje, Danijoje, Pranc\u016bzijoje, Olandijoje, Lenkijoje, \u0160vedijoje ir kt.), analogi\u0161kas reguliavimas jau rengiamas ir Lietuvoje. \u0160is projektas mokslininkams kelia abejoni\u0173 ir d\u0117l teisingos konkurencijos \u012fgyvendinimo. Pavyzd\u017eiui, subjektams, kurie teikia pav\u0117\u017e\u0117jimo paslaugas, reikalavimas \u012frengti mechanizmus, leid\u017eian\u010dius u\u017evesti varikl\u012f tik atlikus blaivumo test\u0105, neb\u016bt\u0173 taikomas ir tai potencialiai gal\u0117t\u0173 paveikti konkurencines rinkos s\u0105lygas. [:en] The researchers of the Law Institute of Lithuania (hereinafter \u2013 LIL) recommend not to approve of the requirements to install ignition interlock devices in rental cars. After resonant events, the Seimas has deliberated the draft Law on Road Traffic Safety in order to establish a new provision on installation of ignition interlock devices in cars. The amendment provides that \u201ca vehicle intended for rental, owned by a company that provides car rental services, must have a breath alcohol ignition interlock device installed\u201d. LIL researchers presented their conclusion to the Seimas Committee on Legal Affairs noting that such regulation would aggravate operation of specific economic entities \u2013 companies that provide vehicle rental services. Rented cars constitute only a small share of overall traffic; furthermore, there are no statistical data to substantiate a bigger number of car accidents due to drunk driving of rented cars. \u201cAdditional requirements for one group of rented vehicles would not be consistent and reasonable. That would be selective regulation (choosing only one segment), which is not suitable,\u201d states the researchers\u2019 conclusion presented to the Seimas. LIL researchers note that drunk drivers often repeat this infringement. Therefore, it would be much more reasonable to consider installation of ignition interlock devices in the cars of those persons who have already been punished for drunk driving. Installation of such a device could be the mitigating circumstance (e.g. the driving licence withdrawal period could be shorter if the driver installs such a device in his\/her used vehicle). Such practice has been spreading across Europe (Austria, Denmark, France, the Netherlands, Poland, Sweden, etc.), and analogical regulatory legislation has been drafted in Lithuania. This project also arouses doubts of researchers as to fair competition. For example, a requirement to install a breath alcohol ignition interlock devices would not be applied to entities that provide ride-sharing services and this could potentially affect competitive market conditions. [:]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2946,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,261],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2945","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-naujienos","category-2018-naujienu-irasu-metai"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2945","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2945"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2945\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6799,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2945\/revisions\/6799"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2946"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2945"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2945"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2945"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}