http:\/\/teise.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Lankauskas-2018_2-96.pdf<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n[:]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
[:lt] Kalbant apie korupcij\u0105 Lietuvos \u017einiasklaidoje itin problemin\u0117 sritis yra vie\u0161ojo administravimo subjekt\u0173 administruojamos vie\u0161inimui skirtos (da\u017eniausiai Europos S\u0105jungos strukt\u016brin\u0117s paramos) l\u0117\u0161os, kurios galimai \u012fsisavinamos per neskaidrius konkursus ir da\u017enai kaip tarpininkams veikiant vie\u0161\u0173j\u0173 ry\u0161i\u0173 agent\u016broms, kuri\u0173 veikla yra ma\u017eai reglamentuojama. Toki\u0105 i\u0161vad\u0105 savo mokslo straipsnyje pateik\u0117 Lietuvos teis\u0117s instituto (LTI) mokslininkas Mindaugas Lankauskas. Publikacijoje \u201eKorupcijos rai\u0161ka ir neskaidrumas Lietuvos \u017einiasklaidoje\u201c mokslininkas ra\u0161o, jog korupcija \u017einiasklaidoje yra sud\u0117tingas fenomenas, pasi\u017eymintis latentiniu pob\u016bd\u017eiu ir tod\u0117l sunkiai tiriamas ar pamatuojamas. Kaip teigiama mokslin\u0117je literat\u016broje, \u017einiasklaidos korumpuotumo lygis priklauso nuo korupcijos i\u0161ve\u0161\u0117jimo atitinkamoje visuomen\u0117je. Korupcija \u017einiasklaidoje pasi\u017eymi skirtinga strukt\u016bra, intensyvumu bei dinamika \u012fvairiuose pasaulio regionuose ir valstyb\u0117se, kai kuriose pokomunistin\u0117se valstyb\u0117se matyti sistemin\u0117s \u017einiasklaidos korupcijos bruo\u017e\u0173. Publikacijos i\u0161vadose skelbiama, kad Lietuva nepriskirtina prie valstybi\u0173, kuriose klesti sistemin\u0117 \u017einiasklaidos korupcija, ta\u010diau yra tam tikr\u0173 problemini\u0173 sri\u010di\u0173, toki\u0173 kaip pad\u0117tis regionin\u0117je \u017einiasklaidoje ar vie\u0161inimo paslaug\u0173 teikimo srityje. Apklaust\u0173 ekspert\u0173 nuomone, egzistuoja neskaidr\u016bs politik\u0173 ir \u017einiasklaidos priemoni\u0173 ry\u0161iai, taip pat tr\u016bksta skaidrumo \u017einiasklaidos priemoni\u0173 valdyme ir kt. Mokslininkas teigia, kad \u017einiasklaidos veiklos skaidrumui daugiausia \u012ftakos darantys subjektai yra verslas, politikai ir \u017einiasklaidos priemoni\u0173 savininkai. Didelis pavojus kyla tuomet, kai politikai yra visuomen\u0117s informavimo priemoni\u0173 savininkai, o da\u017enu atveju atsiranda ir vadinamasis oligarchinis trikampis, kai i\u0161vien veikia politikai, verslas ir \u017einiasklaidos priemon\u0117s (ar j\u0173 savininkai). Siekiant didinti skaidrum\u0105 \u0161ioje srityje, siektina, kad informacija apie \u017einiasklaidos priemon\u0117s valdym\u0105 b\u016bt\u0173 kiek \u012fmanoma labiau vie\u0161inama. Svarstytina galimyb\u0117 tobulinti teisin\u012f reguliavim\u0105, visuomen\u0117s informavimo priemon\u0117ms nustatant pareig\u0105 vie\u0161inti toki\u0105 informacij\u0105 oficialiuose visuomen\u0117s informavimo priemoni\u0173 tinklalapiuose. Visas M.\u00a0Lankausko publikacijos tekstas paskelbtas LTI leid\u017eiamo leidinio \u201eTeis\u0117s problemos\u201c antrame \u0161i\u0173 met\u0173 numeryje. Vis\u0105 publikacijos tekst\u0105 ir kitus straipsnius nemokamai galima skaityti \u010dia: http:\/\/teise.org\/lt\/lti-veikla\/teises-problemos\/ [:en] Concerning corruption in Lithuanian media, a particularly problematic area is funding (in most cases from EU structural funds) for public relations that is administered by public bodies, which is potentially absorbed through non-transparent tenders, where public relations agencies, activities whereof are little regulated, act as intermediaries. This conclusion has been drawn by Mindaugas Lankauskas, a researcher of the Law Institute of Lithuania (hereinafter – LIL), in his scientific article. In his publication \u201cCorruption and Lack of Transparency in Lithuanian Media\u201d the researcher writes that corruption in media is a complex phenomenon with latent character; therefore, it is quite complicated to research and measure. According to scientific literature, the level of corruption in the media sector depends on the prevalence of corruption in a particular society. Media corruption has a different structure, intensity and dynamics in different world regions and countries, whereas the situation in some post-communist countries could be characterised as systemic media corruption. The publication concludes that Lithuania is not assigned to the group of countries with systemic media corruption thriving; however, there are problematic areas such as the situation in regional media or provision of public relations services. According to the opinion of the surveyed experts, there exist non-transparent relations between politicians and media outlets and lack of transparency could be observed regarding ownership of media outlets, etc. The researcher states that key players with regard to transparency of media activities are businesses, politicians and owners of media outlets. A big threat to transparency is when politicians own media outlets, and often the so-called oligarchic triangle emerges, when politicians, businesses and media outlets (or owners of the outlets) work together. In order to increase transparency in this sector, information concerning ownership of media outlets should be made available to the public as much as possible. A possibility to improve legal regulation by imposing a requirement for media outlets to provide such information on their official websites should be considered. The full text of publication by Mr. Lankauskas is included in the second issue of \u201cLegal Issues\u201d (2018) published by LIL. Full publication and other articles are freely available here: http:\/\/teise.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Lankauskas-2018_2-96.pdf [:]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3015,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,261],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3014","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-naujienos","category-2018-naujienu-irasu-metai"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3014","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3014"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3014\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6788,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3014\/revisions\/6788"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3015"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3014"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3014"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3014"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}