http:\/\/teise.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tarasevicius-2018_2-96.pdf<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n[:]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
[:lt] Mokslininkai rekomenduoja nustatyti ai\u0161kesn\u012f kriminalin\u0117s \u017evalgybos duomen\u0173 ir kriminalin\u0117s \u017evalgybos informacijos santyk\u012f. Lietuvos teis\u0117s instituto (LTI) mokslininkas dr.\u00a0Petras Tarasevi\u010dius savo mokslo straipsnyje analizavo kriminalin\u0117s \u017evalgybos informacijos samprat\u0105 ir jos interpretavimo problemas. Jis atkreip\u0117 d\u0117mes\u012f \u012f tai, kad pakeitus \u017evalgybos institucij\u0173 bei kriminalin\u0117s \u017evalgybos subjekt\u0173 veiklos teisin\u012f reguliavim\u0105 s\u0105voka ,,operatyvin\u0117 informacija\u201c buvo ne tik pakeista s\u0105voka ,,kriminalin\u0117s \u017evalgybos informacija\u201c, ta\u010diau taip pat buvo susiaurintas \u0161ios s\u0105vokos turinys. \u201e\u0160i s\u0105voka, pagal Lietuvos nacionalin\u012f reguliavim\u0105, \u017evalgybos doktrin\u0105 bei Europos saugumo ir bendradarbiavimo organizacijos propaguojam\u0105 \u017evalgybos informacija pagr\u012fst\u0105 policin\u0117s veiklos model\u012f, interpretuojama skirtingai\u201c, \u2013 konstatuoja savo darbe mokslininkas P.\u00a0Tarasevi\u010dius. Straipsnio i\u0161vadose jis pa\u017eymi, jog pavyzdin\u0117 Europos kriminalin\u0117s \u017evalgybos koncepcija bei tam tikri \u0161ios veiklos organizavimo principai skiriasi nuo \u0161ios veiklos organizavimo ir koncepcijos Lietuvoje. Tai yra svarbu formuojant kriminalin\u0117s \u017evalgybos strategij\u0105 ir numatant \u0161ios veiklos teisinio reguliavimo tobulinimo perspektyvas. \u201eEuropos saugumo ir bendradarbiavimo organizacijos kvietimas adaptuoti bei \u012fgyvendinti \u017evalgybos informacija pagr\u012fst\u0105 policin\u0117s veiklos model\u012f nacionaliniu mastu yra rimtas argumentas per\u017ei\u016br\u0117ti teis\u0117s akt\u0173 nuostatas, siekiant nustatyti ai\u0161kesn\u012f kriminalin\u0117s \u017evalgybos metu surinkt\u0173 bei u\u017efiksuot\u0173 duomen\u0173 ir kriminalin\u0117s \u017evalgybos informacijos santyk\u012f\u201c, \u2013 mokslo straipsnio i\u0161vadose skelbia mokslininkas. Vis\u0105 straipsnio tekst\u0105 galima rasti LTI leidinyje \u201eTeis\u0117s problemos\u201c http:\/\/teise.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tarasevicius-2018_2-96.pdf [:en] Researchers recommend establishing a clearer relationship between criminal intelligence data and criminal intelligence information. In his scientific article Dr. Petras Tarasevi\u010dius, a researcher of the Law Institute of Lithuania (hereinafter – LIL), analyses the concept of criminal intelligence information and the problems of its interpretation. He points out that having changed legal regulation of the activities of intelligence institutions and criminal intelligence entities, the concept of operational information has not only been replaced by the concept of criminal intelligence information, but it has also become narrower. \u201cThis concept is interpreted differently according to the Lithuanian national regulation, the intelligence doctrine and the framework model for intelligence-led policing implementation advocated by the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe,\u201d states Mr. Tarasevi\u010dius in his paper. He notes in the conclusions of his article that the exemplary conception of European criminal intelligence and certain principles of organisation of this activity differ from organisation of the activity and the conception in Lithuania. It is important for the development of criminal intelligence strategy and outlining the prospects of improvement of legal regulation of this activity. \u201cThe invitation of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe to adapt and use the framework model for intelligence-led policing implementation nationwide could be a serious step forward in revising the current legal framework from criminal intelligence to the data collection through criminal intelligence activities,\u201d concludes the researcher in his article. The full text of the article is available in the LIL publication \u201cLegal Issues\u201d http:\/\/teise.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Tarasevicius-2018_2-96.pdf [:]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3022,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,261],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3021","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-naujienos","category-2018-naujienu-irasu-metai"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3021","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3021"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3021\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6787,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3021\/revisions\/6787"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3022"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3021"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3021"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3021"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}