http:\/\/teise.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Bikelis-2018_2-96.pdf<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n[:]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
[:lt] Lietuvos teis\u0117s instituto (LTI) mokslininkas dr. Skirmantas Bikelis nagrin\u0117ja nusikaltimo padarymo (da\u017eniausiai \u2013 transporto) priemoni\u0173 konfiskavimo klausim\u0105 \u2013 ar dilema konfiskuoti arba nekonfiskuoti priemon\u0119 n\u0117ra per siaura? Mokslininkas svarsto, gal kai kuriais atvejais teisingiau b\u016bt\u0173 rinktis vidurio keli\u0105 \u2013 konfiskuoti jos dal\u012f ar dal\u012f jos vert\u0117s. Dr. S.\u00a0Bikelis LTI leid\u017eiamame leidinyje \u201eTeis\u0117s problemos\u201c paskelb\u0117 mokslo straipsn\u012f \u201eNusikaltimo padarymo priemon\u0117s dalies konfiskavimas ar jos vert\u0117s dalies i\u0161ie\u0161kojimas i\u0161 proporcingumo principo perspektyvos\u201c. Straipsnyje pristatomas platesnis, nei Lietuvoje kol kas \u012fprasta, sprendim\u0173 d\u0117l nusikaltimo padarymo priemon\u0117s konfiskavimo spektras. Dr. S.\u00a0Bikelis publikacijoje pateikia pavyzd\u017ei\u0173 ir argument\u0173, kokiose situacijose ir kod\u0117l su teisingumo ir proporcingumo principais labiau der\u0117t\u0173 ne visos nusikaltimo padarymo priemon\u0117s konfiskavimas ar visi\u0161kas nekonfiskavimas, o priemon\u0117s dalies ar jos vert\u0117s dalies konfiskavimas. Anot mokslininko, dalies nusikaltimo padarymo priemon\u0117s konfiskavimo ar dalies jos vert\u0117s i\u0161ie\u0161kojimo galimyb\u0117 (kartais \u2013 net ir b\u016btinyb\u0117) nuosekliai i\u0161plaukia i\u0161 konstitucini\u0173 proporcingumo ir teisingumo princip\u0173. Publikacijos i\u0161vadose mokslininkas teigia, kad sprendimas konfiskuoti dal\u012f nusikaltimo padarymo priemon\u0117s gali pad\u0117ti pa\u0161alinti tr\u016bkumus, kuriais tam tikromis aplinkyb\u0117mis gali pasi\u017eym\u0117ti kra\u0161tutiniai sprendimai \u2013 konfiskuoti vis\u0105 nusikaltimo padarymo priemon\u0119 ar i\u0161ie\u0161koti vis\u0105 jos vert\u0119 arba visi\u0161kai netaikyti \u0161i\u0173 priemoni\u0173. Tais atvejais, kai darant nusikaltim\u0105 yra bendrininkaujama, si\u016blytina tolygiai paskirstyti nusikalstamos veikos padarymo priemon\u0117s vert\u0117s i\u0161ie\u0161kojimo na\u0161t\u0105 visiems bendrininkams, atsi\u017evelgiant \u012f j\u0173 vaidmen\u012f ir kitas bylos aplinkybes. Mokslininkas pa\u017eymi, jog kartu b\u016btina u\u017etikrinti, kad i\u0161 kiekvieno bendrininko priteisiama nusikalstamos veikos padarymo priemon\u0117s vert\u0117s dalis (taip pat ir jam ar jai paskirt\u0173 priemoni\u0173 visuma) b\u016bt\u0173 proporcinga jo atsakomyb\u0117s laipsniui. Besidomintieji vis\u0105 publikacijos tekst\u0105 su konkre\u010diais pavyzd\u017eiais gali rasti \u010dia: http:\/\/teise.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Bikelis-2018_2-96.pdf [:en] Dr. Skirmantas Bikelis, a researcher of the Law Institute of Lithuania (hereinafter – LIL), explores the issue of confiscation of crime instrumentalities (most often a car): Is the dilemma of confiscation or non-confiscation of instrumentalities not too narrow? The researcher considers that in some cases a fair decision could be confiscation of part of instrumentalities or part of their value. Dr. Bikelis published a scientific article \u201cConfiscation of part of crime instrumentalities or part of their value and principle of proportionality\u201d in the LIL publication \u201cLegal Issues\u201d. The article presents a wider spectrum of decisions in the field of confiscation of the instrumentalities of the offence that is still common in Lithuania. Dr. Bikelis gives examples and arguments in which situations and for what reason confiscation of part of instrumentalities or part of their value would be more in line with the principles of fairness and proportionality than full confiscation of instrumentalities or non-confiscation. According to the researcher, a possibility (and sometimes even a necessity) of confiscation of part of the instrumentalities or part of their value coherently results from the constitutional principles of proportionality and fairness. The researcher concludes that a decision to confiscate part of instrumentalities could help eliminate drawbacks that ultimate decisions \u2013 to confiscate all instrumentalities or their full value or not to confiscate at all \u2013 might be characterised of under certain circumstances. In cases where accomplices are involved in the offence, he proposes to distribute the burden of confiscation of the value of crime instrumentalities in a proportionate manner among accomplices with regard to their role in the offence and to all the circumstances of the particular case. The researcher points out that it is also necessary to ensure that the part of the value of the instrumentalities confiscated from each of the accomplices (as well as the whole of measures imposed on him\/her) is proportionate to his\/her degree of liability. The full text of publication with concrete examples is available here: http:\/\/teise.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Bikelis-2018_2-96.pdf [:]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3079,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,261],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3078","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-naujienos","category-2018-naujienu-irasu-metai"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3078","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3078"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3078\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6785,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3078\/revisions\/6785"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3079"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3078"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3078"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3078"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}