[:lt]<\/p>\n
Kal\u0117jim\u0173 departamento Probacijos skyriaus organizuotame renginyje \u201cBendradarbiavimo galimyb\u0117s vykdant probacijos veiksmingumo mokslin\u0119 steb\u0117sen\u0105\u201d buvo pristatyta Lietuvos teis\u0117s instituto mokslinink\u0173 dr. Gintauto Sakalausko ir Liubov\u0117s Jarutien\u0117s mokslo studija \u201eProbacijos veiksmingumo vertinimas\u201c. <\/p>\n
\u0160ios mokslo studijos tikslas \u2013 \u012fvertinti Lietuvoje probacijos veiksmingumo vertinimui naudojamus kriterijus, aptarti j\u0173 prana\u0161umus ir tr\u016bkumus, i\u0161analizuoti pagrindinius probacijos veiklos rodiklius, i\u0161nagrin\u0117ti u\u017esienio \u0161alyse taikomus probacijos sistemos veiksmingumo vertinimo modelius bei kriterijus ir pateikti rekomendacijas d\u0117l probacijos sistemos veiklos veiksmingumo vertinimo Lietuvoje.<\/p>\n
Atliekant \u0161i\u0105 mokslo studij\u0105 buvo nagrin\u0117jami probacij\u0105 ir strategin\u012f planavim\u0105 reglamentuojantys teis\u0117s aktai, analizuota ir apibendrinta probacijos veiklos statistika. Siekiant i\u0161tirti u\u017esienio \u0161alyse sukaupt\u0105 probacijos sistemos veiksmingumo vertinimo patirt\u012f, analizuotos mokslin\u0117s publikacijos, u\u017esienio \u0161ali\u0173 teis\u0117s aktai, statistika, probacijos tarnyb\u0173 veiklos ataskaitos ir kita med\u017eiaga. <\/p>\n
Rengiant mokslo studij\u0105 buvo i\u0161analizuota \u0161e\u0161i\u0173 u\u017esienio \u0161ali\u0173 \u2013 Airijos, Anglijos ir Velso, Jungtini\u0173 Amerikos Valstij\u0173, Kanados, Naujosios Zelandijos ir Vokietijos \u2013 probacijos veiksmingumo vertinimo patirtis. <\/p>\n
Mokslininkai tikisi, kad \u0161i mokslo studija suteiks papildom\u0173 galimybi\u0173 ir priemoni\u0173 gerinti probacijos sistemos veiksmingum\u0105 ir jo vertinim\u0105 Lietuvoje, bus naudinga bausmi\u0173 vykdymo sistem\u0105 analizuojantiems mokslininkams ir joje dirbantiems praktikams, taip pat studijuojantiems ir visiems, besidomintiems bausmi\u0173 vykdymo problematika. Vis\u0105 mokslo studijos tekst\u0105 galima rasti \u010dia:\u00a0http:\/\/www.teise.org\/data\/Mokslo-studija-probacijos-veiksmingumo-vertinimas.pdf<\/u><\/p>\n
Lietuvos Probacijos \u012fstatymas probacij\u0105 apibr\u0117\u017eia kaip s\u0105lygin\u0119 alternatyv\u0105 paskirtai laisv\u0117s at\u0117mimo bausmei (bausm\u0117s vykdymo atid\u0117jim\u0105 ir lygtin\u012f paleidim\u0105 i\u0161 pataisos \u012fstaig\u0173), kurios metu vykdoma probuojamojo prie\u017ei\u016bra. Probacijos tikslas yra u\u017etikrinti veiksming\u0105 probuojam\u0173j\u0173 resocializacij\u0105 ir ma\u017einti j\u0173 nusikalstam\u0173 veik\u0173 recidyv\u0105. \u0160io tikslo tur\u0117t\u0173 b\u016bti siekiama \u012fvairiomis Probacijos \u012fstatyme nustatytomis priemon\u0117mis, kurioms \u012fgyvendinti Lietuvoje sukurta probacijos tarnyb\u0173 sistema. Per metus \u012f probacijos tarnyb\u0173 registr\u0105 pastaruoju metu patenka ma\u017edaug 20 t\u016bkst. asmen\u0173, ir nors i\u0161 \u0161io skai\u010diaus ne visiems paskiriama probacija formali\u0105j\u0105 prasme (asmenys, kuriems ji buvo paskirta, sudaro ma\u017edaug pus\u0119 vis\u0173 probacijos tarnyb\u0173 registre buvusi\u0173 asmen\u0173), akivaizdu, jog darbas su \u0161iais asmenimis turi b\u016bti kiek \u012fmanoma veiksmingesnis.<\/p>\n
[:en]<\/p>\n
Research study \u201cAssessment of Probation Effectiveness\u201d carried out by the researchers from the Law Institute of Lithuania dr. Gintautas Sakalauskas and Liubov\u0117 Jarutien\u0117 was presented during the Prison Department organized event \u201cThe possibilities of cooperation through scientific monitoring of the probation effectiveness\u201d.<\/p>\n
The aim of this research study is to assess measured used for the assessment of probation effectiveness in Lithuania, discuss their advantages and disadvantages, analyze key indicators of probation service, investigate models and criteria of assessment of probation effectiveness applied in foreign countries, as well as to provide recommendation on the assessment of probation system in Lithuania.<\/p>\n
In the course of this study authors were analysing the legislation of probation and strategic planning, and also the statistical data of probation performance. In order to examine the experience of foreign countries, scientific publications, foreign legislation acts, statistical data and reports of probation services have been analysed.<\/p>\n
The analysis covered the experience of six countries, i.e. Ireland, England and Wales, USA, Canada, New Zealand and Germany.<\/p>\n
The researchers hope that this study will provide additional opportunities and measured to improve the effectiveness of probation system and its assessment in Lithuania, will be useful for researchers analyzing the penal system and practitioners working in it, as well as for student and anyone interested in the problems of the enforcement of sentences.<\/p>\n
Lithuania Probation Ace define probation as a conditional alternative to imprisonment, i.e. conditional release or suspension of custodial sentence, which essentially implied offender supervision. The main purpose of is to ensure effective resocialization of probationers and reduce the rate of their recidivism. In order to gain this purpose, Lithuanian probation system applies various measures, which are specified in the Probation Act. Lithuanian probation services supervise about 20,000 persons a year. Although only nearly a half of these persons are the ones with suspension of custodial sentence or conditionally released, it is obvious that the effective probation services are at the best interest of both the sentenced persons and the whole society.<\/p>\n
[:]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
[:lt] Kal\u0117jim\u0173 departamento Probacijos skyriaus organizuotame renginyje \u201cBendradarbiavimo galimyb\u0117s vykdant probacijos veiksmingumo mokslin\u0119 steb\u0117sen\u0105\u201d buvo pristatyta Lietuvos teis\u0117s instituto mokslinink\u0173 dr. Gintauto Sakalausko ir Liubov\u0117s Jarutien\u0117s mokslo studija \u201eProbacijos veiksmingumo vertinimas\u201c. \u0160ios mokslo studijos tikslas \u2013 \u012fvertinti Lietuvoje probacijos veiksmingumo vertinimui naudojamus kriterijus, aptarti j\u0173 prana\u0161umus ir tr\u016bkumus, i\u0161analizuoti pagrindinius probacijos veiklos rodiklius, i\u0161nagrin\u0117ti u\u017esienio \u0161alyse taikomus probacijos sistemos veiksmingumo vertinimo modelius bei kriterijus ir pateikti rekomendacijas d\u0117l probacijos sistemos veiklos veiksmingumo vertinimo Lietuvoje. Atliekant \u0161i\u0105 mokslo studij\u0105 buvo nagrin\u0117jami probacij\u0105 ir strategin\u012f planavim\u0105 reglamentuojantys teis\u0117s aktai, analizuota ir apibendrinta probacijos veiklos statistika. Siekiant i\u0161tirti u\u017esienio \u0161alyse sukaupt\u0105 probacijos sistemos veiksmingumo vertinimo patirt\u012f, analizuotos mokslin\u0117s publikacijos, u\u017esienio \u0161ali\u0173 teis\u0117s aktai, statistika, probacijos tarnyb\u0173 veiklos ataskaitos ir kita med\u017eiaga. Rengiant mokslo studij\u0105 buvo i\u0161analizuota \u0161e\u0161i\u0173 u\u017esienio \u0161ali\u0173 \u2013 Airijos, Anglijos ir Velso, Jungtini\u0173 Amerikos Valstij\u0173, Kanados, Naujosios Zelandijos ir Vokietijos \u2013 probacijos veiksmingumo vertinimo patirtis. Mokslininkai tikisi, kad \u0161i mokslo studija suteiks papildom\u0173 galimybi\u0173 ir priemoni\u0173 gerinti probacijos sistemos veiksmingum\u0105 ir jo vertinim\u0105 Lietuvoje, bus naudinga bausmi\u0173 vykdymo sistem\u0105 analizuojantiems mokslininkams ir joje dirbantiems praktikams, taip pat studijuojantiems ir visiems, besidomintiems bausmi\u0173 vykdymo problematika. Vis\u0105 mokslo studijos tekst\u0105 galima rasti \u010dia:\u00a0http:\/\/www.teise.org\/data\/Mokslo-studija-probacijos-veiksmingumo-vertinimas.pdf Lietuvos Probacijos \u012fstatymas probacij\u0105 apibr\u0117\u017eia kaip s\u0105lygin\u0119 alternatyv\u0105 paskirtai laisv\u0117s at\u0117mimo bausmei (bausm\u0117s vykdymo atid\u0117jim\u0105 ir lygtin\u012f paleidim\u0105 i\u0161 pataisos \u012fstaig\u0173), kurios metu vykdoma probuojamojo prie\u017ei\u016bra. Probacijos tikslas yra u\u017etikrinti veiksming\u0105 probuojam\u0173j\u0173 resocializacij\u0105 ir ma\u017einti j\u0173 nusikalstam\u0173 veik\u0173 recidyv\u0105. \u0160io tikslo tur\u0117t\u0173 b\u016bti siekiama \u012fvairiomis Probacijos \u012fstatyme nustatytomis priemon\u0117mis, kurioms \u012fgyvendinti Lietuvoje sukurta probacijos tarnyb\u0173 sistema. Per metus \u012f probacijos tarnyb\u0173 registr\u0105 pastaruoju metu patenka ma\u017edaug 20 t\u016bkst. asmen\u0173, ir nors i\u0161 \u0161io skai\u010diaus ne visiems paskiriama probacija formali\u0105j\u0105 prasme (asmenys, kuriems ji buvo paskirta, sudaro ma\u017edaug pus\u0119 vis\u0173 probacijos tarnyb\u0173 registre buvusi\u0173 asmen\u0173), akivaizdu, jog darbas su \u0161iais asmenimis turi b\u016bti kiek \u012fmanoma veiksmingesnis. [:en] Research study \u201cAssessment of Probation Effectiveness\u201d carried out by the researchers from the Law Institute of Lithuania dr. Gintautas Sakalauskas and Liubov\u0117 Jarutien\u0117 was presented during the Prison Department organized event \u201cThe possibilities of cooperation through scientific monitoring of the probation effectiveness\u201d. The aim of this research study is to assess measured used for the assessment of probation effectiveness in Lithuania, discuss their advantages and disadvantages, analyze key indicators of probation service, investigate models and criteria of assessment of probation effectiveness applied in foreign countries, as well as to provide recommendation on the assessment of probation system in Lithuania. In the course of this study authors were analysing the legislation of probation and strategic planning, and also the statistical data of probation performance. In order to examine the experience of foreign countries, scientific publications, foreign legislation acts, statistical data and reports of probation services have been analysed. The analysis covered the experience of six countries, i.e. Ireland, England and Wales, USA, Canada, New Zealand and Germany. The researchers hope that this study will provide additional opportunities and measured to improve the effectiveness of probation system and its assessment in Lithuania, will be useful for researchers analyzing the penal system and practitioners working in it, as well as for student and anyone interested in the problems of the enforcement of sentences. Lithuania Probation Ace define probation as a conditional alternative to imprisonment, i.e. conditional release or suspension of custodial sentence, which essentially implied offender supervision. The main purpose of is to ensure effective resocialization of probationers and reduce the rate of their recidivism. In order to gain this purpose, Lithuanian probation system applies various measures, which are specified in the Probation Act. Lithuanian probation services supervise about 20,000 persons a year. Although only nearly a half of these persons are the ones with suspension of custodial sentence or conditionally released, it is obvious that the effective probation services are at the best interest of both the sentenced persons and the whole society. [:]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":590,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,259],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-430","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-naujienos","category-2016-naujienu-irasu-metai"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/430","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=430"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/430\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6932,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/430\/revisions\/6932"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/590"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=430"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=430"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=430"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}