[:lt]<\/p>\n
Ilg\u0105 laik\u0105 Lietuvoje buvo siekiama u\u017etikrinti pa\u010di\u0105 teis\u0119 \u012f teisin\u0119 pagalb\u0105, tik pastaraisiais metais \u017eengiama toliau – vis daugiau d\u0117mesio skiriama teisin\u0117s pagalbos kokybei, standartams, teikimo prie\u017ei\u016brai ir kontrolei, o gerieji pavyzd\u017eiai tampa Europos modeliu ar pavyzd\u017eiu kit\u0173 valstybi\u0173 teisin\u0117ms sistemoms tobulinti.<\/p>\n
Tokius aspektus konferencijoje \u201eValstyb\u0117s garantuojama antrin\u0117 teisin\u0117 pagalba: status quo ir i\u0161\u0161\u016bkiai\u201c akcentavo Lietuvos teis\u0117s instituto mokslinink\u0117s Egl\u0117 Kavoli\u016bnait\u0117 – Ragauskien\u0117 ir dr. Agn\u0117 Limant\u0117.<\/p>\n
Konferencijoje, kurioje nema\u017eai d\u0117mesio buvo skirta valstyb\u0117s garantuojamos teisin\u0117s pagalbos kokybei, mokslinink\u0117s pristat\u0117 savo prane\u0161im\u0105 \u201eTeisin\u0117s pagalbos kokyb\u0117s standartai: Europin\u0117 dimensija\u201c. Prane\u0161ime buvo ne tik pristatomas dabartinis teisinis reguliavimas, analizuojama situacija Europos \u0161alyse.<\/p>\n
Pirmuoju Europos S\u0105jungos dokumentu, kuriame kalbama apie teisin\u0117s pagalbos kokyb\u0119, laikoma 2013 m. lapkri\u010dio 27 d. Europos Komisijos (EK) Rekomendacija d\u0117l \u012ftariam\u0173j\u0173 arba kaltinam\u0173j\u0173 teis\u0117s \u012f teisin\u0119 pagalb\u0105 baud\u017eiamajame procese. Iki 2016 m. lapkri\u010dio 27 d. Lietuva tur\u0117s informuoti EK apie priemones, kuri\u0173 imtasi \u0161ioms rekomendacijoms \u012fgyvendinti. Siekiant teisin\u0117s pagalbos kokyb\u0117s, turi b\u016bti u\u017etikrinama advokat\u0173 darbo kokyb\u0117, sukurti mechanizmai, leid\u017eiantys pakeisti teisin\u0119 pagalb\u0105 teikian\u010dius advokatus arba pareikalauti i\u0161 j\u0173 vykdyti \u012fsipareigojimus, jei \u0161ie nesuteikia tinkamos teisin\u0117s pagalbos. Taip pat tur\u0117t\u0173 b\u016bti sukurta akreditavimo sistema, organizuojami mokymai ir kt.<\/p>\n
Mokslinink\u0117s savo prane\u0161ime akcentavo, kad nustatyti vienodus standartus visose Europos S\u0105jungos \u0161alyse labai sud\u0117tinga d\u0117l skirtingo teisin\u0117s pagalbos finansavimo lygio (\u017er. lentel\u0119). Palyginimui \u2013 skai\u010diuojant i\u0161laidas vienam \u017emogui, Anglija ir Velsas teisinei pagalbai skiria i\u0161 esm\u0117s tiek pat, kiek Lietuvoje skiriama visiems teismams, \u012fskaitant Konstitucin\u012f Teism\u0105, Nacionalinei teism\u0173 administracijai ir prokurat\u016brai kartu sud\u0117jus.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0160ali\u0173 i\u0161laidos teisinei pagalbai\u00a0(mln. eur.)<\/p>\n
Anglija ir Velsas 2 489
Vokietija 533
Nyderlandai 484,7
Pranc\u016bzija 351
\u0160kotija 182
Airija 97,41
Belgija 76,6
Suomija 67,7
Lenkija 22,86<\/p>\n
[:en]<\/p>\n
For a long time Lithuania was to ensure the right to legal aid, but only in recent years Lithuania gone further – more and more attention is paid to the legal aid quality standards, delivery monitoring and control, and the good examples are the European model and a model for improvement of other jurisdictions.<\/p>\n
These aspects highlighted by the scientists of the Law Institute of Lithuania Egl\u0117 Kavoli\u016bnait\u0117 – Ragauskiene and Dr. Agne Limant\u0117 during the conference „State-guaranteed secondary legal aid: the status quo and challenges”.<\/p>\n
During the conference, which focused on a quality of state-guaranteed legal aid, the researchers presented their report „Legal Aid Quality Standards: European dimension\u201d. The report presents the current legal regulation as well as analyzes the situation in the European countries.<\/p>\n
The first European Union document, which refers to the quality of legal aid, is 27 of November 2013 The European Commission (EC) recommendation of suspects or accused persons the right to legal assistance in criminal proceedings. Before 27 of November 2016, Lithuania will have to inform the European Commission about the measures taken to implement these recommendations. For the quality of legal aid the quality of lawyers must be guaranteed also, mechanisms created in order to change lawyers providing legal assistance or to require them to carry out their commitments, if they do not provide adequate legal assistance. There should also be developed accreditation system, organized trainings etc.<\/p>\n
Scientists in their report emphasized that it is very difficult to set uniform standards for all European Union countries because of differences regarding the level of funding for legal aid (see. Table below). For comparison – in calculating the cost per person, the costs provided for legal aid in England and Wales are almost the same as the costs of all Lithuanian courts, including the Constitutional Court, the National Courts Administration and the Public Prosecutor’s Office put together.<\/p>\n
The costs of legal aid in various countries (mln. EUR).<\/p>\n
England and Wales 2489
Germany 533
Netherlands 484.7
France 351
Scotland 182
Ireland 97.41
Belgium 76.6
Finland 67.7
Poland 22,86<\/p>\n
[:]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
[:lt] Ilg\u0105 laik\u0105 Lietuvoje buvo siekiama u\u017etikrinti pa\u010di\u0105 teis\u0119 \u012f teisin\u0119 pagalb\u0105, tik pastaraisiais metais \u017eengiama toliau – vis daugiau d\u0117mesio skiriama teisin\u0117s pagalbos kokybei, standartams, teikimo prie\u017ei\u016brai ir kontrolei, o gerieji pavyzd\u017eiai tampa Europos modeliu ar pavyzd\u017eiu kit\u0173 valstybi\u0173 teisin\u0117ms sistemoms tobulinti. Tokius aspektus konferencijoje \u201eValstyb\u0117s garantuojama antrin\u0117 teisin\u0117 pagalba: status quo ir i\u0161\u0161\u016bkiai\u201c akcentavo Lietuvos teis\u0117s instituto mokslinink\u0117s Egl\u0117 Kavoli\u016bnait\u0117 – Ragauskien\u0117 ir dr. Agn\u0117 Limant\u0117. Konferencijoje, kurioje nema\u017eai d\u0117mesio buvo skirta valstyb\u0117s garantuojamos teisin\u0117s pagalbos kokybei, mokslinink\u0117s pristat\u0117 savo prane\u0161im\u0105 \u201eTeisin\u0117s pagalbos kokyb\u0117s standartai: Europin\u0117 dimensija\u201c. Prane\u0161ime buvo ne tik pristatomas dabartinis teisinis reguliavimas, analizuojama situacija Europos \u0161alyse. Pirmuoju Europos S\u0105jungos dokumentu, kuriame kalbama apie teisin\u0117s pagalbos kokyb\u0119, laikoma 2013 m. lapkri\u010dio 27 d. Europos Komisijos (EK) Rekomendacija d\u0117l \u012ftariam\u0173j\u0173 arba kaltinam\u0173j\u0173 teis\u0117s \u012f teisin\u0119 pagalb\u0105 baud\u017eiamajame procese. Iki 2016 m. lapkri\u010dio 27 d. Lietuva tur\u0117s informuoti EK apie priemones, kuri\u0173 imtasi \u0161ioms rekomendacijoms \u012fgyvendinti. Siekiant teisin\u0117s pagalbos kokyb\u0117s, turi b\u016bti u\u017etikrinama advokat\u0173 darbo kokyb\u0117, sukurti mechanizmai, leid\u017eiantys pakeisti teisin\u0119 pagalb\u0105 teikian\u010dius advokatus arba pareikalauti i\u0161 j\u0173 vykdyti \u012fsipareigojimus, jei \u0161ie nesuteikia tinkamos teisin\u0117s pagalbos. Taip pat tur\u0117t\u0173 b\u016bti sukurta akreditavimo sistema, organizuojami mokymai ir kt. Mokslinink\u0117s savo prane\u0161ime akcentavo, kad nustatyti vienodus standartus visose Europos S\u0105jungos \u0161alyse labai sud\u0117tinga d\u0117l skirtingo teisin\u0117s pagalbos finansavimo lygio (\u017er. lentel\u0119). Palyginimui \u2013 skai\u010diuojant i\u0161laidas vienam \u017emogui, Anglija ir Velsas teisinei pagalbai skiria i\u0161 esm\u0117s tiek pat, kiek Lietuvoje skiriama visiems teismams, \u012fskaitant Konstitucin\u012f Teism\u0105, Nacionalinei teism\u0173 administracijai ir prokurat\u016brai kartu sud\u0117jus. \u00a0 \u0160ali\u0173 i\u0161laidos teisinei pagalbai\u00a0(mln. eur.) Anglija ir Velsas 2 489Vokietija 533Nyderlandai 484,7 Pranc\u016bzija 351\u0160kotija 182 Airija 97,41Belgija 76,6 Suomija 67,7 Lenkija 22,86 [:en] For a long time Lithuania was to ensure the right to legal aid, but only in recent years Lithuania gone further – more and more attention is paid to the legal aid quality standards, delivery monitoring and control, and the good examples are the European model and a model for improvement of other jurisdictions. These aspects highlighted by the scientists of the Law Institute of Lithuania Egl\u0117 Kavoli\u016bnait\u0117 – Ragauskiene and Dr. Agne Limant\u0117 during the conference „State-guaranteed secondary legal aid: the status quo and challenges”. During the conference, which focused on a quality of state-guaranteed legal aid, the researchers presented their report „Legal Aid Quality Standards: European dimension\u201d. The report presents the current legal regulation as well as analyzes the situation in the European countries. The first European Union document, which refers to the quality of legal aid, is 27 of November 2013 The European Commission (EC) recommendation of suspects or accused persons the right to legal assistance in criminal proceedings. Before 27 of November 2016, Lithuania will have to inform the European Commission about the measures taken to implement these recommendations. For the quality of legal aid the quality of lawyers must be guaranteed also, mechanisms created in order to change lawyers providing legal assistance or to require them to carry out their commitments, if they do not provide adequate legal assistance. There should also be developed accreditation system, organized trainings etc. Scientists in their report emphasized that it is very difficult to set uniform standards for all European Union countries because of differences regarding the level of funding for legal aid (see. Table below). For comparison – in calculating the cost per person, the costs provided for legal aid in England and Wales are almost the same as the costs of all Lithuanian courts, including the Constitutional Court, the National Courts Administration and the Public Prosecutor’s Office put together. The costs of legal aid in various countries (mln. EUR). England and Wales 2489Germany 533Netherlands 484.7France 351Scotland 182Ireland 97.41Belgium 76.6Finland 67.7Poland 22,86 [:]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,258],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-488","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-naujienos","category-2015-naujienu-irasu-metai"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/488","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=488"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/488\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6959,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/488\/revisions\/6959"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=488"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=488"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/teise.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=488"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}