POWERS OF THE SINGLE RESOLUTION BOARD IN THE CONTEXT OF THE SHORT-SELLING CASE (92)

This article aims at examining the mandate provided to the SRB in the context of the Short-selling judgment, and in particular, at analysing whether the granting of discretionary implementing powers to this agency complies with Article 114 TFEU and whether those powers are well framed by conditions and criteria that no scope is le{ for abuse of the delegation.

DIGITAL LIBRARIES: THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ORPHAN WORKS DIRECTIVE IN LITHUANIAN LAW (83)

Digitization of books and other works as well as making them available on the Internet have caused a number of problems across the EU. One of the problems, namely, the digitization of works which right holders cannot be identified or located (“orphan works”) has been addressed in the EU Directive on certain permitted uses of orphan works (2012/28/EU) (“Orphan Works Directive”). This research analyzes the issues that need to be addressed by Lithuanian law maker when transposing the Orphan Works Directive into the national law. In particular, after providing a general evaluation of the Directive, the research paper discusses the organizations that should be allowed to make use of the copyright exception for orphan works as implemented in the Directive, copyrighted subject matter which is covered by the Directive, requirements that apply to the search for right holders and documentation of such a search, how the works that are granted an orphan work status can be used by libraries and other organizations, what happens when the right holder of the orphan work appears and whether there is a need of supplementary national legal mechanisms in dealing with orphan works. The paper seeks to identify both the requirements and the flexibilities of the Directive and suggest the most suitable ways of implementation of the Directive in the national law.

NOVELTIES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE IN THE CONTEXT OF EARLIER CASE LAW (93)

In 2016 statutory law on judicial administrative procedure was signifcantly amended. This inevitably leads to question whether case law, which was laid out in light of earlier statutory law, is going to be followed or can be ignored. The paper deals with this issue, particularly focusing on questions when it is mandatory, permitted or illegal to follow this previous case-law.

CONCISTENCY OF JUVENILE JUSTICE LEGAL ACTS: PROCEDURAL ISSUES (86)

Straipsnyje nagrinėjama, kaip Nepilnamečių justicijos 2009–2013 m. programos vykdymo metu Lietuvoje keičiami teisės aktai, kurie reguliuoja nepilnamečių justiciją, ir ar tie pokyčiai sistemingi, pakankami, atitinkantys programos keliamus tikslus bei uždavinius.